Decide whether the cases below would describe original or appellate jurisdiction. Is it the first time the case is being heard or is the case being reviewed by a higher court (second or third time)? Write "original" or "appellate" next to each case. Court Case Original or Appellate? 1. Tom is accused of shoplifting a CD from a music store so he must go to court. 2. A cashier was found guilty of stealing money but she thinks the evidence against her was seized illegally. She asks a higher court to review her case. 3. After reviewing a lower court ruling, the Supreme Court decided Mrs. J had received an unfair trial. 4. Kanye West was arrested for egging someone's house. I

Decide whether the cases below would describe original or appellate jurisdiction. Is it the first time the case is being heard or is the case being reviewed by a higher court (second or third time)? Write "original" or "appellate" next to each case. Court Case Original or Appellate? 1. Tom is accused of shoplifting a CD from a music store so he must go to court. 2. A cashier was found guilty of stealing money but she thinks the evidence against her was seized illegally. She asks a higher court to review her case. 3. After reviewing a lower court ruling, the Supreme Court decided Mrs. J had received an unfair trial. 4. Kanye West was arrested for egging someone's house. I

Understanding Business

12th Edition

ISBN:9781259929434

Author:William Nickels

Publisher:William Nickels

Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Common law is based on the English legal system. True False Question 2 Case law is body of judge-made laws. True False Question 3 State courts are under the control of the U.S. Supreme court. True False Question 4 A ruling in a tort case that is designed to compensate a plaintiff for their loss is known as: Punitive Locked Out Locked In Compensatory 5.A ruling in a tort case that is designed to compensate a plaintiff for their loss is known as: Negotiation Arbitration Mediation Retaliation
What is the Parol Evidence Rule? Please describe one circumstance in which you believe the rule should be followed and why? Please describe a circumstance in which you believe the rule should not be followed and why? Please not, this is business law question. Thank you.
Identify as to ethical or unethical the following situations then prove your answer. 1. Addressing client’s complains in real time.2. Copying the work of others without giving due recognition to the owner.3. Hospital wastes being disposed in bodies of water or empty lots.4. Non-disclosure of the company’s financial condition to investors.5. Compensating employees with above minimum salary, food and transportation allowance, medical insurance, and housing.
1) A black firefighter alleges that each time he is transferred from one fire station to another, he must take his bed with him, on orders of the fire chief. The fire chief defends on the basis that it is a legitimate decision because white firefighters would not want to sleep in the same bed in which a black firefighter slept. Is this illegal under Title VII? Explain 2) A white college receptionist is fired when it is found that she told a black college applicant that the applications for admissions are distinguished by race by the notation of a small Rh in the corner of black applicants’ applications.”Rh,”she says, is her supervisor’s term for “raisin heads, “which he calls African-Americans. Is this employee entitled to reinstatement? 3) jose and Cesar, both Hispanic, are carpenters employed by a contractor to help build an office building in Maryland. While working, Jose and Cesar discover that they are being paid less than non-Hispanic employees. In addition, they allege a hostile…
1a. What are the general principles of consumer protection? 1b. Discuss the nature of and parties in a consumer protection suit. Who can bring a suit and why? 1c. Who is held accountable under the consumer protection laws?
Choose a random court case Write a case summary that includes the following information: Parties to the case and names of defendants and plaintiffs. The primary issue at the heart of the lawsuit (e.g., copyright, labor law, unfair competition) and the reasons or events that caused the plaintiff to file the lawsuit. Provide a brief summary of the keys facts in the case from the perspective of all parties. Generally, these will be the claims of the plaintiff and the defenses of the defendant. If a decision has been made in the case, what was it? If damages were awarded, how much were they? If the damages were not monetary, what did the court order the parties to do or not do because of the lawsuit? If the case has not been decided, then what is the plaintiff asking the court to do if it prevails? Regardless of whether the case is decided or not, what are the implications or potential implications for the businesses involved and the stakeholders of those businesses?
12 You are the vice president for software development at a small, private firm. Sales of your firm's products have been strong, but you recently detected a patent infringement by one of your larger competitors. Your in-house legal staff has identified three options: (1) ignore the infringement out of fear that your larger competitor will file numerous countersuits; (2) threaten to file suit, but try to negotiate an out-of-court settlement for an amount of money that you feel your larger competitor would readily pay; or (3) point out the infringement and negotiate aggressively for a cross-licensing agreement with the competitor, which has numerous patents you had considered licensing. What are the pros and cons of each option? Which option would you pursue and why?
Find a case with the following citation: 792 F.3d 1146. Assume your client lives in Maine that this case is relevant to your clients issue. Is this case authoritative for your client?a. Yes, as long as the facts of the case are identical to the facts of your clients case. b. Yes, as long as the facts of the case are similar to the facts of your clients case.c. No.d. No, but only because the case is over five years old, and therefore no longer good law.e. Unable to tell from the fact given in this question.
True-False and Multiple Choice Questions. 1. A trial de novo is a trial with new discovery, testimony, and evidence.2. If th Delaware Court of Common Pleas (a general trail court and court of record) makes a common law decision, that decision becomes precedent for all Delaware courts.3. Primary methods of alternative dispute resolution include litigation, mediation and arbitration.4. Delivering the complaint and attached summons to the defendant establishes in personam judgment for the court,5. Sandra sued her employer, Cape Inc., claiming that she was wrongfully terminated from her is a criminal lawsuit.6. The jury decides the law and the judge decides the facts.7. The categorical imperative approach to ethical decision making is to ask the following question â€œwhich alternative causes the greatest good (or least harm) to the most people?â€8. A summons is a paper ordering a defendant to answer a complaint within a certain time.9. According to the…
A few days before the end of the term of a two-year NDA (nondisclosure agreement) he signed witha startup company related to a possible patent, Frank interviewed with another startup and divulgedinformation covered by the agreement. The interview had been scheduled for a week later, in whichcase it wouldn’t have been an issue, but had been moved up when another job applicant dropped outand the company had an opening for an earlier interview. Frank reasoned that he had met the spiritof the NDA, and a few days early wouldn’t really matter. Besides, as it turned out, the company heinterviewed with wasn’t interested in that information, although they did hire him. What would youhave done if you were Frank?
2. Punitive damages are: a. generally not available in tort cases. b. often awarded in cases of contract interference. c. only available in negligence actions. d. None of the above
If an insurer receives an application for Travel Health insurance that reveals the applicant has a pre-existing medical condition, certain action may be taken. Which one (1) of the following actions would the insurer most likely NOT take? OA) The application may be rejected. OB) Policy benefits may be limited or capped. OC) An additional premium may be required. OD) The application will be referred to a "High-Risk Pool" of insurers.