Many people believe that the world of digital technology may be roughly divided into two groups: those who have access to a computer and the Internet, and others who do not. Some people believe that this has substantial ethical implications and that there is a moral obligation to remedy the imbalance. Those who "have nots" may feel discriminated against or socially ostracized, and they miss out on a wide variety of life opportunities as a result. Do you believe that everyone, regardless of where they live, their needs, their level of ability, or their financial means, ought should have access to computers and the Internet? Who is responsible for providing services and education, as well as footing the bill? Why isn't having access to the internet a must for everyone?
Many people believe that the world of digital technology may be roughly divided into two groups: those who have access to a computer and the Internet, and others who do not. Some people believe that this has substantial ethical implications and that there is a moral obligation to remedy the imbalance. Those who "have nots" may feel discriminated against or socially ostracized, and they miss out on a wide variety of life opportunities as a result. Do you believe that everyone, regardless of where they live, their needs, their level of ability, or their financial means, ought should have access to computers and the Internet? Who is responsible for providing services and education, as well as footing the bill? Why isn't having access to the internet a must for everyone?
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps