Nona Co. purchased land worth P20,000,000 on January 1, 2021. The company uses the revaluation model in accounting for its PPE. On December 31, 2021, an independent appraiser valued the land at P43,000,000. But on December 31, 2022, the land had a fair value of P8,000,000. How much revaluation deficit/impairment loss should be recognized in the income statement on December 31, 2022?

Nona Co. purchased land worth P20,000,000 on January 1, 2021. The company uses the revaluation model in accounting for its PPE. On December 31, 2021, an independent appraiser valued the land at P43,000,000. But on December 31, 2022, the land had a fair value of P8,000,000. How much revaluation deficit/impairment loss should be recognized in the income statement on December 31, 2022?

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX.,2020-W/ACCESS

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357110362

Author:Murphy

Publisher:Murphy

Chapter10: Cost Recovery On Property: Depreciation, Depletion, And Amortization

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 44P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

At the end of 2020, Magenta Manufacturing Company discovered that construction cost had been capitalized as a cost of the factory building in 2015 when it should have been treated as a cost of production equipment installation costs. As a result of the misclassification, the depreciation through 2018 was understated by 110,000, and depreciation for 2019 was understated by 90,000. What would be the consequences of correcting for the misclassification of the property cost? a. The taxpayer uses the FIFO inventory method, and 25% of goods produced during the period were included in the ending inventory. b. The taxpayer uses the LIFO inventory method, and no new LIFO layer was added during 2019.
Gray Companys financial statements showed income before income taxes of 4,030,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, and 3,330,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Additional information is as follows: Capital expenditures were 2,800,000 in 2020 and 4,000,000 in 2019. Included in the 2020 capital expenditures is equipment purchased for 1,000,000 on January 1, 2020, with no salvage value. Gray used straight-line depreciation based on a 10-year estimated life in its financial statements. As a result of additional information now available, it is estimated that this equipment should have only an 8-year life. Gray made an error in its financial statements that should be regarded as material. A payment of 180,000 was made in January 2020 and charged to expense in 2020 for insurance premiums applicable to policies commencing and expiring in 2019. No liability had been recorded for this item at December 31, 2019. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflected in Grays financial statements was 7,000 at December 31, 2020, and 97,000 at December 31, 2019. During 2020, 90,000 of uncollectible receivables were written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. In 2019, the provision for doubtful accounts was based on a percentage of net sales. The 2020 provision has not yet been recorded. Net sales were 58,500,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, and 49,230,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Based on the latest available facts, the 2020 provision for doubtful accounts is estimated to be 0.2% of net sales. A review of the estimated warranty liability at December 31, 2020, which is included in other liabilities in Grays financial statements, has disclosed that this estimated liability should be increased 170,000. Gray has two large blast furnaces that it uses in its manufacturing process. These furnaces must be periodically relined. Furnace A was relined in January 2014 at a cost of 230,000 and in January 2019 at a cost of 280,000. Furnace B was relined for the first time in January 2020 at a cost of 300,000. In Grays financial statements, these costs were expensed as incurred. Since a relining will last for 5 years, Grays management feels it would be preferable to capitalize and depreciate the cost of the relining over the productive life of the relining. Gray has decided to nuke a change in accounting principle from expensing relining costs as incurred to capitalizing them and depreciating them over their productive life on a straight-line basis with a full years depreciation in the year of relining. This change meets the requirements for a change in accounting principle under GAAP. Required: 1. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, prepare a worksheet reconciling income before income taxes as given previously with income before income taxes as adjusted for the preceding additional information. Show supporting computations in good form. Ignore income taxes and deferred tax considerations in your answer. The worksheet should have the following format: 2. As of January 1, 2020, compute the retrospective adjustment of retained earnings for the change in accounting principle from expensing to capitalizing relining costs. Ignore income taxes and deferred tax considerations in your answer.
At the beginning of 2019, Conley Company purchased an asset at a cost of 10,000. For financial reporting purposes, the asset has a 4-year life with no residual value and is depreciated by the straight-line method beginning in 2019. For tax purposes, the asset is depreciated under MACRS using a 5-year recovery period. Prior to 2019, Conley had no deferred tax liability or asset. The difference between depreciation for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes is the only temporary difference between pretax financial income and taxable income. The current income tax rate is 30%, and no change in the tax rate has been enacted for future years. In 2019 and 2020, taxable income will be higher or lower than financial income by what amount?
Duck, an accrual basis corporation, sponsored a rock concert on December 29, 2019. Gross receipts were 300,000. The following expenses were incurred and paid as indicated: Because the coliseum was not scheduled to be used again until January 15, the company with which Duck had contracted did not perform the cleanup until January 810, 2020. a. Calculate Ducks net income from the concert for tax purposes for 2019. b. Using the present value tables in Appendix H, what is the true cost to Duck if it had to defer the 100,000 deduction for the performers until 2020? Assume a 5% discount rate and a 21% marginal tax rate in 2019 and 2020.
Nona Co. purchased land worth P20,000,000 on January 1, 2021. The company uses the revaluation model in accounting for its PPE. On December 31, 2021, an independent appraiser valued the land at P43,000,000. But on December 31, 2022, the land had a fair value of P8,000,000. How much revaluation deficit/impairment loss should be recognized in the income statement on December 31, 2022? (No need to put "+" or "", just place absolute value)
Omar Company owns a property which was revalued to $ 625,000 on 31 December 2018 with a revaluation gain of $250,000 being recognized as other comprehensive income and recorded in the revaluation surplus. At 31, December 2020 the property had a carrying amount of $575,000 but the recoverable amount of the property was estimated at only $250,000. 1- What is the amount of impairment? 2- How the revaluation and the impairment should be treated in the financial statements?
Annood Company owns land that it purchased at a cost of $700,000 in 2018. The land's recoverable value fluctuate as follows (all amounts as of December 31): 2018, $680,000; 2019, $720,000. The journal entry to record impairment of the land in 2019 would be: a. Debit land account, $20,000, credit impairment loss recovery, $20,000 O b. Debit impairment loss account, $20,000; credit land account, $20,000 O c. Debit land account, 40,000; credit impairment loss recovery, $40,000 O d. No entry is required under IFRS 36.
mark Inc. purchased a machinery on January 1, 2020, at a cost of P1,250,000. It is being depreciated using the straight-line method over its projected useful life of 8 years. On December 31, 2021, the asset’s fair value was P1,125,000. Accordingly, an entry was made on that date to recognize the revaluation surplus. Revaluation is recorded maintaining the proportionate relationship between the asset account and accumulated depreciation. It is the company policy to transfer a portion of revaluation surplus to retained earnings every period. What is the amount of revaluation surplus reported in equity on December 31, 2022?
On February 14, 2022, Frozen Company classified a non-current asset as held for sale. At that time, the asset's carrying amount was P64,000. It's fair value was estimated at P48,000 and the cost to sell at P3,800. On May 9, 2022, the asset was sold for P42,000 and paid transaction costs of P2,000. The company accounts for non-current assets using the cost model. 9. How much impairment loss is to be recorded by Frozen relating to the non-current assets held for sale? 10. At what amount should the non-current assets held for sale be recorded on Feb. 14, 2022? 11. How much gain(loss) is to be reported by Frozen on the disposal of the non-current assets held for sale?
Shamrock Inc. owns equipment that cost $470,000 and has accumulated depreciation of $122,000. The expected future net cash flows from the use of the asset are expected to be $311,000. The fair value of the equipment is $269,000. Prepare the journal entry, if any, to record the impairment loss. (If no entry is required, select "No Entry" for the account titles and enter O for the amounts. Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. Do not indent manually.) Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
An entity had the following events and transactions during 2020: Depreciation for 2019 was understated by P500,000 A litigation settlement resulted in a loss of P2,000,000 The inventory on December 31, 2018 was overstated by P800,000 The entity disposed of a recreational division at a loss P1,500,000 The income tax rate is 30%. What total amount of loss should be included in income from continuing operations for 2020?
Waterway Ltd. owns land that it purchased at a cost of ¥464,000 in 2020. The company chooses to use revaluation accounting to account for the land. The land's value fluctuates as follows (all amounts in thousands as of December 31): 2020, ¥522,000; 2021, ¥417,600; 2022, ¥446,600; 2023, ¥475,600; and 2024, ¥533,600. Complete the following table. (Enter negative amounts using either a negative sign preceding the number e.g.-45 or parentheses e.g. (45).) Value at December 31 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 ¥ Other Comprehensive Income 58,000 (58,000) 0 11,600 58,000 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income 58,000 0 0 11,600 69,600 Recognized in Net Income 0 (46,400) 29,000 17,400 0