Feb-20 1605 50 Mar-20 2349 51 Apr-20 2468 52 May-20 2532 53 Jun-20 3127 54 Jul-20 3288 55 Aug-20 3285 56 Sep-20 2485 57 Oct-20 2723 58 Nov-20 1835 59 Dec-20 1894 60 The method of exponential smoothing is not preferred because it cannot predict the future values for the year 2022. The method of simple linear regression analysis is preferred over exponential smoothing. Because the method of linear regression analysis is helpful in predicting future values for the year 2022,. Solution Answer: The method of exponential smoothing is not preferred because it cannot predict future values for the year 2022. The method of simple linear regression analysis is preferred over exponential smoothing. Because the method of linear regression analysis is helpful in predicting future values for the year 2022,. IS THIS ANSWER HELPFUL? Step 1: Month Sales t Jan-16 747 1 1) Feb-16 697 2 slope- Mar-16 1014 3 intercept = 26.61 SLOPE(B2:B61,C2:C61) 975.42 INTERCEPT(B2:B61,C2:C61) Apr-16 1126 4 regression equation: sale = 975.42 + 26.61*x May-64 1105 5 Jun-16 1450 6 month t predicted sales sales predicted =975.42 + 26.61 t Jul-16 1639 7 Jan-22 73 2918.131 =$F$4+$F$3*F8 Aug-16 1711 8 Feb-22 74 2944.744 =$F$4+$F$3*F9 Sep-16 1307 9 Mar-22 75 2971.356 =$F$4+$F$3*F10 Oct-16 1223 10 Apr-22 76 2997.969 =$F$4+$F$3*F11 Nov-16 975 11 May-22 77 3024.581 =$F$4+$F$3*F12 Dec-16 953 12 Jun-22 78 3051.194 =$F$4+$F$3*F13 Jan-17 1024 13 Jul-22 79 3077.806 Feb-17 926 14 Aug-22 80 3104.419 Mar-17 1442 15 Sep-22 81 3131.031 Apr-17 1371 16 Oct-22 82 3157.644 May-17 1536 17 Nov-22 83 3184.256 =$F$4+$F$3*F14 =$F$4+$F$3*F15 =$F$4+$F$3*F16 =$F$4+$F$3*F17 =$F$4+$F$3*F18 Jun-17 2004 | 18 Dec-22 84 3210.869 =$F$4+$F$3*F19 Jul-17 1854 19 Aug-17 1951 20 Sep-17 1516 21 Oct-1 1642 22 Nov-17 1166|23 Dec-17 1106 24 Jan-18 1189 25

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
hello i just wanna know if my answer to this question is correct or wrong:
 
Consider five years of monthly pro fit for a company
C) Discuss whether a simple exponential smoothing model works well with this data or not.
Month Sales
Jan-16 747
Feb-16 697
Mar-16 1014
Apr-16 1126
May-16 1105
Jun-16 1450
Jul-16 1639
Aug-16 1711
Sep-16 1307
Oct-16 1223
Nov-16 975
Dec-16 953
Jan-17 1024
Feb-17 928
Mar-17 1442
Apr-17 1371
May-17 1536
Jun-17 2004
Jul-17 1854
Aug-17 1951
Sep-17 1516
Oct-17 1642
Nov-17 1166
Dec-17 1106
Jan-18 1189
Feb-18 1209
Mar-18 1754
Apr-18 1843
May-18 1769
Jun-18 2207
Jul-18 2471
Aug-18 2288
Sep-18 1867
Oct-18 1980
Nov-18 1418
Dec-18 1333
Jan-19 1333
Feb-19 1370
Mar-19 2142
Apr-19 2138
May-19 2078
Jun-19 2960
Jul-19 2616
Aug-19 2861
Sep-19 2237
Oct-19 2225
Nov-19 1590
Dec-19 1659
Jan-20 1613
Feb-20 1605
Mar-20 2349
Apr-20 2468
May-20 2532
Jun-20 3127
Jul-20 3288
Aug-20 3285
Sep-20 2485
Oct-20 2723
Nov-20 1835
Dec-20 1894
 
here is my answer:
 
Assessing the Applicability of Simple Exponential Smoothing (SES) Model:
A time series forecasting technique called SES uses a weighted average of historical observations to predict future values, giving more weight to more recent data.
 
Trend Analysis: Despite some ups and downs over the course of the five years, an overall upward trend is seen. This discrepancy calls into question the applicability of a straightforward exponential smoothing model that depends on a steady trend.
 
Examining Seasonality: Although sales occasionally rise and fall, the seasonality is erratic, making it challenging for the model to appropriately represent and forecast. With such erratic patterns, a basic exponential smoothing model might face difficulties.
 
Evaluation of Variability: The considerable variation in monthly sales points to noisy data, making it more difficult for the model to discern between real trends and chance variations.
 
Randomness Consideration: Since the model might not be able to distinguish between systematic patterns and random noise, forecasting is made more difficult by random fluctuations in sales.
 
In summary:
The irregularities, variability, and randomness in the data pose challenges to SES, even though it may be able to partially capture the increasing trend. To get more accurate forecasts, it is therefore advised to use alternative forecasting techniques designed to handle such complexities, such as seasonal ARIMA or dynamic regression models.
 
 
 
fuerthermore i dont know if i should use a graph to justify this answer but i found one for this data online and not sure if i should use it or not and here is what they say for why not to use smooth modle:
The method of exponential smoothing is not preferred because it cannot predict future values for the year 2022. The method of simple linear regression analysis is preferred over exponential smoothing. Because the method of linear regression analysis is helpful in predicting future values for the year 2022,.
 
in picture 1 is what the expert gave me not sure if that i should use is or not in this question.
Feb-20 1605 50
Mar-20 2349 51
Apr-20 2468 52
May-20 2532 53
Jun-20 3127 54
Jul-20 3288 55
Aug-20 3285 56
Sep-20 2485 57
Oct-20 2723 58
Nov-20 1835 59
Dec-20 1894 60
The method of exponential smoothing is not preferred because it cannot predict the future values for the
year 2022. The method of simple linear regression analysis is preferred over exponential smoothing.
Because the method of linear regression analysis is helpful in predicting future values for the year 2022,.
Solution
Answer:
The method of exponential smoothing is not preferred because it cannot predict future values for the
year 2022. The method of simple linear regression analysis is preferred over exponential smoothing.
Because the method of linear regression analysis is helpful in predicting future values for the year
2022,.
IS THIS ANSWER HELPFUL?
Transcribed Image Text:Feb-20 1605 50 Mar-20 2349 51 Apr-20 2468 52 May-20 2532 53 Jun-20 3127 54 Jul-20 3288 55 Aug-20 3285 56 Sep-20 2485 57 Oct-20 2723 58 Nov-20 1835 59 Dec-20 1894 60 The method of exponential smoothing is not preferred because it cannot predict the future values for the year 2022. The method of simple linear regression analysis is preferred over exponential smoothing. Because the method of linear regression analysis is helpful in predicting future values for the year 2022,. Solution Answer: The method of exponential smoothing is not preferred because it cannot predict future values for the year 2022. The method of simple linear regression analysis is preferred over exponential smoothing. Because the method of linear regression analysis is helpful in predicting future values for the year 2022,. IS THIS ANSWER HELPFUL?
Step 1:
Month Sales t
Jan-16 747 1
1)
Feb-16 697 2 slope-
Mar-16 1014 3
intercept =
26.61 SLOPE(B2:B61,C2:C61)
975.42 INTERCEPT(B2:B61,C2:C61)
Apr-16 1126 4
regression equation: sale = 975.42 + 26.61*x
May-64 1105 5
Jun-16 1450 6
month
t
predicted sales
sales predicted =975.42 + 26.61 t
Jul-16 1639 7
Jan-22
73
2918.131
=$F$4+$F$3*F8
Aug-16 1711 8
Feb-22
74
2944.744
=$F$4+$F$3*F9
Sep-16 1307 9
Mar-22
75
2971.356
=$F$4+$F$3*F10
Oct-16 1223 10
Apr-22
76
2997.969
=$F$4+$F$3*F11
Nov-16 975 11
May-22
77
3024.581
=$F$4+$F$3*F12
Dec-16 953 12
Jun-22
78
3051.194
=$F$4+$F$3*F13
Jan-17 1024 13
Jul-22
79
3077.806
Feb-17 926 14
Aug-22
80
3104.419
Mar-17 1442 15
Sep-22
81
3131.031
Apr-17 1371 16
Oct-22
82
3157.644
May-17 1536 17
Nov-22
83
3184.256
=$F$4+$F$3*F14
=$F$4+$F$3*F15
=$F$4+$F$3*F16
=$F$4+$F$3*F17
=$F$4+$F$3*F18
Jun-17 2004 | 18
Dec-22
84
3210.869
=$F$4+$F$3*F19
Jul-17 1854 19
Aug-17 1951 20
Sep-17 1516 21
Oct-1 1642 22
Nov-17 1166|23
Dec-17 1106 24
Jan-18 1189 25
Transcribed Image Text:Step 1: Month Sales t Jan-16 747 1 1) Feb-16 697 2 slope- Mar-16 1014 3 intercept = 26.61 SLOPE(B2:B61,C2:C61) 975.42 INTERCEPT(B2:B61,C2:C61) Apr-16 1126 4 regression equation: sale = 975.42 + 26.61*x May-64 1105 5 Jun-16 1450 6 month t predicted sales sales predicted =975.42 + 26.61 t Jul-16 1639 7 Jan-22 73 2918.131 =$F$4+$F$3*F8 Aug-16 1711 8 Feb-22 74 2944.744 =$F$4+$F$3*F9 Sep-16 1307 9 Mar-22 75 2971.356 =$F$4+$F$3*F10 Oct-16 1223 10 Apr-22 76 2997.969 =$F$4+$F$3*F11 Nov-16 975 11 May-22 77 3024.581 =$F$4+$F$3*F12 Dec-16 953 12 Jun-22 78 3051.194 =$F$4+$F$3*F13 Jan-17 1024 13 Jul-22 79 3077.806 Feb-17 926 14 Aug-22 80 3104.419 Mar-17 1442 15 Sep-22 81 3131.031 Apr-17 1371 16 Oct-22 82 3157.644 May-17 1536 17 Nov-22 83 3184.256 =$F$4+$F$3*F14 =$F$4+$F$3*F15 =$F$4+$F$3*F16 =$F$4+$F$3*F17 =$F$4+$F$3*F18 Jun-17 2004 | 18 Dec-22 84 3210.869 =$F$4+$F$3*F19 Jul-17 1854 19 Aug-17 1951 20 Sep-17 1516 21 Oct-1 1642 22 Nov-17 1166|23 Dec-17 1106 24 Jan-18 1189 25
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education