Suppose that the world is populated entirely with rational but amoral individuals that only get utility from wealth. An individual's utility function is U(W) = ln(W + 1) where W is the wealth of the individual. Some individuals start with 0 initial wealth while other individuals start with a wealth of W> 0. Everyone can decide whether or not to steal x units of wealth. The individual know their wealth when they take the decision to steal or not. Stealing has two consequences: first the individual gains x$ of wealth up to 2$ of wealth. Second, with probability p = 0.6 the individual gets caught and has to pay back 2x$, that is twice the amount stolen. The penalty is capped by the individual's wealth: the individual can never get less than 0$ of wealth in that world. a) How much should the individual steal if they have an initial wealth of w >> 0? b) How much should the individual steal if they started with no initial wealth? c) Now suppose that there is no limit to the amount that can be stolen and that the penalty when caught is simply to pay back the amount stolen. What amount should an individual with a large initial wealth steals? What about an individual with

Suppose that the world is populated entirely with rational but amoral individuals that only get utility from wealth. An individual's utility function is U(W) = ln(W + 1) where W is the wealth of the individual. Some individuals start with 0 initial wealth while other individuals start with a wealth of W> 0. Everyone can decide whether or not to steal x units of wealth. The individual know their wealth when they take the decision to steal or not. Stealing has two consequences: first the individual gains x$ of wealth up to 2$ of wealth. Second, with probability p = 0.6 the individual gets caught and has to pay back 2x$, that is twice the amount stolen. The penalty is capped by the individual's wealth: the individual can never get less than 0$ of wealth in that world. a) How much should the individual steal if they have an initial wealth of w >> 0? b) How much should the individual steal if they started with no initial wealth? c) Now suppose that there is no limit to the amount that can be stolen and that the penalty when caught is simply to pay back the amount stolen. What amount should an individual with a large initial wealth steals? What about an individual with

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The following four figures show the utility of wealth functions for 4 different consumers. Which consumer is the most likely to accept a coin toss gamble where she could win $10 if heads and lose $10 if tails? A B C D نان A Wealth B Wealth C Wealth D Wealth
Betty is looking for a job. She considers job opportunities intwo cities. Bettyís utility is given by y- x, where y is the lifetime income andx is the amount spent on buying a house. The income from City 1 fluctuatesalthough the house price is stable. On the contrary, the income from City2 is stable while the house price fluctuates. If she moves to City 1, Bettycan earn a lifetime income y1 with probability alpha and 1 + y1 with probability1-alpha . The house price in City 1 is x1. Moving to City 2 means that Bettycan earn an income of y2. However, the house price is x2 with probabilitygamma and 1 + x2 with probability 1-gamma . Do the following: (a) Write down theexpected utilities associated with living in the two respective cities, i.e., V1and V2. (b) Derive the condition under which Betty chooses City 1.
Jamal has a utility function U= W1/2 where Wis his wealth in millions of 'dollars and Uis the utility he obtains from that wealth. In the final stage of a game show, the host offers Jamal a choice between (A) $4 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1million with a probability of 0.6 and $9 million with a probability of 0.4. a. Graph Jamal's utility function. Is he risk-averse? Explain. b. Does A or B offer, Jamal, a higher expected price? Explain your reasoning with appropriate calculations. (Hint: The expected value of a random variable is the weighted average of the possible outcomes, where the probabilities are the weights.) c. Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected utility? Again, show your calculations. d. Should Jamal pick A or B? Why?
Let W0 represents an individual’s current wealth and U(W) is this individual’s von Neumann-Morgenstern utility index (or utility function) that reflects how s/he feels about various levels of wealth. Assume this individual marginal utility of wealth decreases a wealth increases. Which of the following statements is true? a. This individual will prefer to keep his or her current wealth rather than taking a fair gamble. b. For this individual, a 50-50 chance of winning or losing c dollars yields less expected utility than does refusing the bet. c. This individual is said to be risk averse. d. All of the above.
Adam has just purchased a new car and has to decide whether to buy insurance to cover his new car in the event of a loss. Assume that Adam knows the probability (p) of him having an accident and losing his new car. The car is valued at L and the amount of insurance to purchase for this value is X. Adam’s entire wealth after buying the car is W. Let r be unit price of insurance. Briefly explain the problem of the insurance company and show that for insurance to be actuarially fair, the premium must equal the probability of accident.
Jin's Utility Function Wealth Utility (Dollars) 60,000 4,000 61,000 4,110 62,000 4,209 63,000 4,288 Refer to Table 27-1. If Jin's current wealth is $61,000, then O his gain in utility from gaining $1,000 is less than his loss in utility from losing $1,000. Jin is not risk averse. O his gain in utility from gaining $1,000 is greater than his loss in utility from losing $1,000. Jin is not risk averse. O his gain in utility from gaining $1,000 is greater than his loss in utility from losing $1,000. Jin is risk averse. his gain in utility from gaining $1,000 is less than his loss in utility from losing $1,000. Jin is risk averse.
Jamal has a utility function U = W1/2, where W is his wealth in millions of dollars and U is the utility he obtains from that wealth. In the final stage of a game show, the host offers Jamal a choice between (A) $4 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1 million with probability 0.6 and $9 million with probability 0.4. a. b. c. d. Graph Jamal’s utility function. Is he risk averse? Explain. (2+2) Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected prize? Explain your reasoning with appropriate calculations. (1) Does A or B offer Jamal a higher expected utility? Explain your reasoning with calculations. (2) Should Jamal pick A or B? Why?
# 4 Consider an individual with a utility function of the form u(w) = √w. The individual has an initial wealth of $4. He has two investments options available to him. He can eitffer keep his wealth in an interest-free account or he can take part in a particularly generous lottery that provides $12 with probability of 1/2 and $0 with probability 1/2. Assume that this person does not have to incur a cost if he decides to take part in the lottery. (a) Will this individual participate in the lottery? (b) Calculate this individual's certainty equivalent associated with the lottery. What is his risk premium?
4. Marvin is given a number of choices between various lotteries where the possible outcomes include a vacation, a motorbike, a pair of shoes and a round of applause, or X = {v,m, s, a}. It is known that, according to Marvin's preferences, v > m > s > a. In addition, he claims he would be indifferent between the motorbike and a lottery that results in a vacation with probability 0.4 and a pair of shoes with probability 0.6, and he would furthermore be indifferent between a pair of shoes and a lottery that results in a motorbike with probability 0.5 and a round of applause with probability 0.5. Marvin has a utility function u: X → R (in other words u maps each element in X to a real number) and he in an expected utility maximiser (in other words his preferences conform to the axioms G1 to G6). 4.1. Assuming Marvin's claims about indifference are correct, derive u(m) and u(s) in terms of u(v) and u(a). 4.2. Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions are only unique up to positive affine…
Alex has a utility function U = W2, where W is his wealth in millions of dollars and U is the utility he obtains from that wealth. In the final stage of a game show, the host offers Alex a choice between (A) $9 million for sure, or (B) a gamble that pays $1 million with probability 0.4 and $16 million with probability 0.6. Use the blue curve (circle points) to graph Alex's utility function at wealth levels of $0, $1 million, $4 million, $9 million, and $16 million. Utility (Thousands) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Wealth (Millions of dollars) 16 18 20 V Utility Function (?)
1. A woman with current wealth X has the opportunity to bet an amount on the occurrence of an event that she knows will occur with probability P. If she wagers W, she will received 2W, if the event occur and o if it does not. Assume that the Bernoulli utility function takes the form u(x) = -e-rx with r>0. How much should she wager? Does her utility function exhibit CARA, DARA, IARA?
An individual is oered a choice of either $50 or a lottery which may result in $0and $100, each with equal probability 1/2 . If the individual has a utility function u(w) = 5 + 2w, which one would they choose? If the individual has a utility function u(w) =w1/2 + 1?