1.
Compute inherent risk.
1.
Answer to Problem 20BEA
Inherent risk is $24,000,000.
Explanation of Solution
Inherent Risk:
Inherent risk is a risk that prevails in a system before any control measure is adopted within an organization.
Computation of inherent risk:
Inherent risk can be computed by using the following formula:
Substitute $80,000,000 for impact and 30% for the probability of occurrence in the above formula.
Therefore, inherent risk is $24,000,000.
2.
Compute residual risk of each of the three alternatives.
2.
Answer to Problem 20BEA
Residual risk for alternative A, B, and C is $16,000,000, $7,500,000, and $24,000,000 respectively.
Explanation of Solution
Residual risk can be computed by using the following formula:
Computation of residual risk for alternative A:
Substitute $80,000,000 for impact and 20% for the probability of occurrence in the above formula.
Computation of residual risk for alternative B:
Substitute $50,000,000 for impact and 15% for the probability of occurrence in the above formula.
Computation of residual risk for alternative C:
Substitute $80,000,000 for impact and 30% for the probability of occurrence in the above formula.
Therefore, residual risk for alternative A, B, and C is $16,000,000, $7,500,000, and $24,000,000 respectively.
3.
Compute benefit from each of the three alternatives.
3.
Answer to Problem 20BEA
Benefitfrom alternatives A, B, and C is $8,000,000, $16,500,000, and $0 respectively.
Explanation of Solution
Benefit from a risk response alternative can be computed by using the following formula:
Computation of response benefit from alternative A:
Substitute $24,000,000 for inherent risk and $16,000,000 for residual risk in the above formula.
Computation of response benefit from alternative B:
Substitute $24,000,000 for inherent risk and $7,500,000 for residual risk in the above formula.
Computation of response benefit from alternative C:
Substitute $24,000,000 for inherent risk and $24,000,000 for residual risk in the above formula.
Therefore, benefit from alternatives A, B, and C is $8,000,000, $16,500,000, and $0 respectively.
4.
Compute net benefit from each of the three alternatives.
4.
Answer to Problem 20BEA
Net benefit from alternatives A, B, and C is $5,000,000, $3,500,000, and $0 respectively.
Explanation of Solution
Net benefit from a risk response alternative can be computed by using the following formula:
Computation of net benefit from alternative A:
Substitute $8,000,000 for response benefit and $3,000,000 for response cost in the above formula:
Computation of net benefit from alternative B:
Substitute $16,500,000 for response benefit and $13,000,000 for response cost in the above formula:
Computation of net benefit from alternative C:
Substitute $0 for response benefit and $0 for response cost in the above formula:
Therefore, net benefit from alternatives A, B, and C is $5,000,000, $3,500,000, and $0 respectively.
5.
Identify the alternative which would be adopted by the company.
5.
Explanation of Solution
Alternative A would be chosen by the company since; net benefit is highest in case of alternative A.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 13 Solutions
Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Business Decision-Making
- All parts are under one question, per your policy they all can be answered in full. 6. Within-firm risk and beta risk Understanding risks that affect projects and the impact of risk consideration Yatta Net International has manufacturing, distribution, retail, and consulting divisions. Projects undertaken by the manufacturing and distribution divisions tend to be low-risk projects, because these divisions are well established and have predictable demand. The company started its retail and consulting divisions within the last year, and it is unknown if these divisions will be profitable. The company knew that opening these new divisions would be risky, but its management believes the divisions have the potential to be extremely profitable under favorable market conditions. The company is currently using its WACC to evaluate new projects for all divisions. A. If Yatta Net International does not risk-adjust its discount rate for specific projects properly, which of the…arrow_forwardPerez Auto Repair, Inc. is evaluating a project to purchase equipment that will not only expand the company's capacity but also improve the quality of its repair services. The board of directors requires all capital investments to meet or exceed the minimum requirement of a 10 percent rate of return. However, the board has not clearly defined the rate of return. The president and controller are pondering two different rates of return: unadjusted rate of return and internal rate of return. The equipment, which costs $109,000, has a life expectancy of five years. The increased net profit per year will be approximately $6,600, and the increased cash inflow per year will be approximately $28,023. (PV of $1 and PVA of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided.) Required a-1. Determine the unadjusted rate of return and (use average investment) to evaluate this project. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places. (i.e., 0.2345 should be entered as 23.45).) a-2. Based on the…arrow_forwardMad Scientist, Inc. is considering investing into the nanotechnology business. After conducting a detailed due diligence process, the company's board decided that the current cost of entry into the nanotechnology business is too high. The board also thinks that the commercialization of technological advancements will eventually drive costs down and the company should get into the nanotech business one or two years from now, when they can realize a higher NPV on their investment. Given the above, the board has chosen the option to: Expand Abandon Delayarrow_forward
- Sheaves Corporation economists estimate that a good business environment and a bad business environment are equally likely for the coming year. Management must choose between two mutually exclusive projects. Assume that the project chosen will be the firm’s only activity and that the firm will close one year from today. The firm is obligated to make a $5,400 payment to bondholders at the end of the year. The projects have the same systematic risk, but different volatilities. Consider the following information pertaining to the two projects: Economy Probability Low-VolatilityProject Payoff High-VolatilityProject Payoff Bad .50 $5,400 $4,800 Good .50 6,550 7,150 a. What is the expected value of the firm if the low-volatility project is undertaken? What if the high-volatility project is undertaken? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to the nearest whole dollar, e.g., 32.) b. What is the…arrow_forwardSheaves Corporation economists estimate that a good business environment and a bad business environment are equally likely for the coming year. Management must choose between two mutually exclusive projects. Assume that the project chosen will be the firm’s only activity and that the firm will close one year from today. The firm is obligated to make a $4,400 payment to bondholders at the end of the year. The projects have the same systematic risk, but different volatilities. Consider the following information pertaining to the two projects: Economy Probability Low-VolatilityProject Payoff High-VolatilityProject Payoff Bad .50 $4,400 $3,800 Good .50 5,050 5,650 a. What is the expected value of the firm if the low-volatility project is undertaken? What if the high-volatility project is undertaken? (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to the nearest whole dollar, e.g., 32.) b. What is the…arrow_forwardBarlae Auto Repair, Inc. is evaluating a project to purchase equipment that will not only expand the company's capacity but also improve the quality of its repair services. The board of directors requires all capital investments to meet or exceed the minimum requirement of a 10 percent rate of return. However, the board has not clearly defined the rate of return. The president and controller are pondering two different rates of return: unadjusted rate of return and internal rate of return. The equipment, which costs $200,000, has a life expectancy of five years. The increased net profit per year will be approximately $14,000, and the increased cash inflow per year will be approximately $55,400. (PV of $1 and PVA of $1) (Use appropriate factor(s) from the tables provided.) Required a-1. Determine the unadjusted rate of return and (use average investment) to evaluate this project. a-2. Based on the unadjusted rate of return, should the company invest in the equipment? b-1. What is the…arrow_forward
- Refer to the XYZ Company example in the chapter and the results in Panels A and B of Exhibit 12.7. On the basis of this information, management of the company has decided to delay the implementation of the project for 1 year. Those managers are now interested in knowing how sensitive this decision is with respect to the assumptions they’ve made regarding the basic analysis. Therefore, they have asked you to prepare some supplementary analyses regarding Panel B of Exhibit 12.7. Required: 1. Holding everything else constant, what is the expected NPV of the decision if the probabilities for the three scenarios are as follows: high (20%), medium (47%), and low (33%)? 2. Holding everything else constant, what is the expected NPV of the decision if the probabilities for the three scenarios are as follows: high (24%), medium (43%), and low (33%)? 3. Prepare a 5 × 3 table containing the estimated NPV of the decision to delay for each combination of the following: risk-free rate of interest…arrow_forwardThe probabilities for the states of nature are P(8₁) = 0.20, P(82) = 0.30, and P(83) = 0.50 . For a consulting fee of $5000, an agency will review the plans for the comedy series and indicate the overall chances of a favorable network reaction to the series. Assume that the agency review will result in a favorable (F) or an unfavorable (U) review and that the following probabilities are relevant: P(F) = 0.69 P(U) = 0.31 P($1F) = 0.09 P(82|F) = 0.26 P(83| F) = 0.65 P($₁|U) = 0.45 P(82|U) = 0.39 P(83|U) = 0.16arrow_forwardFor each situation listed below, select the appropriate inherent risk factor that is demonstrated. Each inherent risk factor can be used once, more than once, or not at all. a. A client is estimating an amount that may be owed pending the outcome of a lawsuit that may take several years to resolve. Estimation uncertainty b. Management hires a specialist to assist with determining the value of an inventory of precious gemstones. Complexity C. Due to a global pandemic, the airline industry is experiencing unprecedented disruption of normal business operations. Subjectivity d. Management is estimating the fair value for a derivative financial instrument that is not traded on a public market. e A client must derive a future interest rate by using interpolation techniques from forward interest rates. Barrow_forward
- A corporation has an excess input VAT due to its excessive local purchases of goods and services. This excess input VAT is accumulating every month and reached a significant value. The management is considering to deal with the excess input VAT. Assume that the excess input VAT is directly attributable to its Zero-rated VAT Sales, explain the options that could possibly be considered by the management.arrow_forwardInternal production supervisors of a company’s product line would be MOST likely to ask which of the following questions? Select answer from the options below 1.How much profit can the company expect to earn this year? 2.What can the company afford to pay its employees this year? 3.Which product line is the least profitable and should be eliminated? 4.How much should the company charge for its products to maximize its profit?arrow_forwardJon Jackson Manufacturing is searching for suppliers for its new line of equipment. Jon has narrowed his choices to two sets ofsuppliers. Believing in diversification of risk, Jon would select two suppliers under each choice. However, he is still concernedabout the risk of both suppliers failing at the same time. The “San Francisco option” uses both suppliers in San Francisco. Bothare stable, reliable, and profitable firms, so Jon calculates the “unique-event” risk for either of them to be 0.5%. However, becauseSan Francisco is in an earthquake zone, he estimates the probability of an event that would knock out both suppliers to be 2%.The “North American option” uses one supplier in Canada and another in Mexico. These are upstart firms; John calculates the“unique-event” risk for either of them to be 10%. But he estimates the “super-event” probability that would knock out both of thesesuppliers to be only 0.1%. Purchasing costs would be $500,000 per year using the San Francisco option…arrow_forward
- Managerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning