7868 unit 3 discussion 1 right one

.docx

School

Capella University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

7868

Subject

Management

Date

May 5, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by lyndie.monson on coursehero.com

Week 3 Discussion 3: Selecting a Methodological Approach Two Methodological Approaches: Two methodological approaches introduced this week are grounded theory and case study. Grounded theory, as described by Patton (2015), involves constructing theories grounded in empirical data, prioritizing the perspectives of participants. In contrast, a case study, outlined by Cresswell and Poth (2018), delves deeply into real-life cases through extensive data collection, resulting in detailed case descriptions and thematic analysis. Compare and Contrast Approaches: Grounded theory is characterized by its emphasis on developing theories rooted in empirical evidence, utilizing methods that immerse researchers in real-world contexts, and employing memoing to facilitate theory development (Patton, 2015). Conversely, a case study is known for its in-depth exploration of specific cases, often within predefined parameters, and the presentation of comprehensive insights leading to researcher-derived conclusions (Cresswell & Poth, 2018). While both approaches follow a similar research trajectory, starting with identifying the research problem and concluding with reporting findings, they differ in their methodologies and objectives. Subjects of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory is particularly well-suited when researchers aim to construct theories emerging directly from empirical data, with a focus on comprehending the unfolding processes or actions over time (Patton, 2015). This methodology proves beneficial in situations where existing theoretical frameworks are limited, enabling researchers to generate fresh insights from the bottom up. Conversely, a case study is apt when researchers seek a comprehensive understanding of specific phenomena within their real-life contexts (Cresswell & Poth, 2018). It is especially valuable for exploring intricate, multifaceted issues where a holistic perspective is essential. Both approaches serve as valuable tools for qualitative research, each catering to distinct research questions and objectives. References: Cresswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications. Week 3 Discussion 1: Selecting a Methodological Approach

Tim, your thorough exploration of narrative research and phenomenology demonstrates a clear understanding of these methodological approaches and their applications in qualitative research. I appreciate how you've outlined the key characteristics of each approach, including their focus on storytelling and individual experiences. Your comparison and contrast of the two methodologies highlight important distinctions, particularly in terms of goal, data collection, and analysis methodologies. By delving into the nuances of thematic analysis and the whole-part- whole procedure, you provide valuable insights into how these methods differ in analyzing and interpreting data. Furthermore, your rationale for choosing narrative research and phenomenology is well- articulated and supported by references from assigned readings. You've effectively explained how narrative research helps answer questions related to events' processes, contexts, and relationships, while phenomenology delves into the meaning of events for individuals. Your examples of research questions and interview techniques illustrate the practical application of these methodologies in studying complex phenomena such as job loss. Overall, your thoughtful analysis and clear explanations make a compelling case for the use of narrative research and phenomenology in qualitative research studies. Great job! Cesar, your analysis of narrative research and case study methodologies is thorough and well- articulated. You've demonstrated a clear understanding of the chosen methodological approaches and their respective rationales for designing research studies. Your comparison and contrast of narrative research's focus on storytelling and case study's emphasis on exploring specific variables effectively highlight the unique features of each approach. Additionally, your rationale for choosing these methodologies is well-supported by references from assigned readings, including works by Creswell & Poth (2018), Priya (2021), and Scheffelaar et al. (2021). While your analysis covers the main characteristics and applications of narrative research and case study methodologies comprehensively, one area you might consider elaborating on is the potential limitations or challenges associated with each approach. Providing insights into the potential drawbacks or constraints of using narrative research or case study methods could offer a more balanced perspective on their suitability for different research contexts. Overall, your analysis is well-written and demonstrates a strong grasp of the concepts discussed. You've effectively synthesized information from the assigned readings to support your arguments and provided thoughtful reflections on the applications of narrative research and case study methodologies in qualitative research. Keep up the great work! Sam, you've done an outstanding job in your analysis of phenomenological research and case study methodologies. Your explanation of each approach and their respective characteristics is clear and concise, demonstrating a strong understanding of qualitative research design. I appreciate how you've highlighted the distinct concepts and objectives of phenomenological research and case studies, as well as their differences in methodology and focus.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version