A problem is an issue that disrupts a Commander form achieving a desired goal and the Army defines problem solving as the ability to get answers to questions through a conscious, organized process. The Elements of Thought described by Drs. Paul and Elder assists Army Officers conducting the Army Problem Solving Process by means of critical thinking. The Elements additionally align and strengthen the Army Problem Solving Process and results in a subjective analysis within each step of the process.
According to Field Manual 6-0, the Military Decision Making Process and Troop Leading procedures are the processes Army leaders use for operational problems. The Army Problem Solving Process is what Army leaders use for problems outside of operations.
…show more content…
Illustrated as a pie, Drs. Paul and Elder’s Elements of Thought stand as the following eight slices of reasoning: point of view, purpose, question or problem, information, Inferences and conclusion, concepts and theories, assumptions and implications and consequences. Paul and Elder state that reasoning calls for the use of all eight in no particular order and the starting point is dependent on the problem to solve. They also describe risk in quality of thinking and contribute intellectual standards to aid the model in ensuring thinking meets a minimum standard.
C122 illustrates alignment of the two operations by means of cross walking the Army Problem solving Process with the Elements of Thought describing, the parallelism of the procedures. The elements also serve as a methodical approach applied to each step of the Army Problem Solving Process, ensuring all points of view are considered and meeting a non-biased response, ahead of advancing to the next step of the
…show more content…
Hidden assumptions coupled with entailment, the idea that if x is the answer to question one than y must be the answer to question two, could result in negative results along with unfavorable second and third order of effects.
The Elements of Thought described by Drs. Paul and Elder assists Army Officers conducting the Army Problem Solving Process. This critical thinking model provides organization and logic to the way we think; aligns and strengthens the Army Problem Solving Process and results in objective analysis in each step of the
You will address Total Army Analysis, the process that takes us from the Army of today to the Army of the future.
When a commander has a visualization of the problem, the desired end state becomes that much clearer. Proactive planning contemplates and evaluates potential decisions and actions in advance; it involves visualizing consequences of possible courses of action to determine whether they will contribute to achieving the desired end state. Field Marshal William J. Slim provides an example of how commanders identify complex problems when he encountered multiple problems in Burma in the mid-40s. Marshal achieved successful operations by addressing the problems with the supply, health, and morale of his unit. Once Marshal recognized these three problems, he was able to motivate his unit to achieve success operations in Burma and provided the basing for future operations into China. This example exemplifies that through visualization commander’s can answer complex problems that lead to achieving their desired end state.
The United States Army is a complex organization made up of several commands and managed by different command levels. The U.S. Army is an organization different from that of a business in many unique ways. Specific examples of these differences include: financial reporting, disciplinary review procedures, and tactical operations. Although different in many ways, the Army shares many similar characteristics of a normal profit business. Army personnel are managed by supervisors arranged in a command structure similar to that of a business hierarchy. The Army will also encounter internal and external factors that could impede or enhance operations. As such, planning, organizing, leading, and controlling must be used by managers appropriately
In the problem analysis phase of effective decision making, group members should recognize any obstacle that may arise that needs to be improved or changed and determine the characteristics, magnitude, and possible cause(s) of that obstacle confronting them. This phase lays the groundwork for what the group should be prepared for as they work together (Hirokawa & Salazar, 1999 p. 170).After analyzing the problem, the group should then discuss and establish goals and objectives in order to generate proposed solutions of
During our military careers we are faced with many different situations and problems. We will need to present solutions to these situations and problems. The Army has four types of military briefings for us to choose from to effectively communicate our solutions. These four military briefings are decision briefings, information briefings, mission briefings and staff briefings. Each situation will have a factor in determining which type of military briefing is needed. To know which military briefing is to be used, we must understand the purpose of each briefing. This paper will give a narrative on each of the four military briefs and the steps involved for the presentation of each brief. I will begin with decision briefings. Before I can begin with decision briefings, I must give a brief discussion on the Army’s problem solving process.
Force management, or what is really otherwise known as planned comprehensive change, is in reality a complex and interwoven process. Though it was designed within the confines of a systemic approach referred to as the DOTMLPF (Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership & Education, Personnel and Facilities), in reality it is meant to enable both dutiful and well-thought out change as well as faster, more urgent adjustments in accordance with the evolving nature of war and information gathering tactics. The Army, as one branch involved in this initiative, focuses most of its attention in this regard on the organizational sector because of the way it facilitates an adequate and democratic step-by-step system of review (Student Reader, F102:2). But the fact is that even this initiative remains multi-faceted and appears to be rather bureaucratic in nature (it has five phases, which seems antithetical to an urgent change process), which might not be surprising since implementing the type of changes that are demanded can have major implications of all sorts. Still, it does appear that this concentration is being well received and that it will eventually serve its goal even if it does not appear that way when detailed on a point by point basis.
The historical process of creating and implementation of the Military Decision Making Process has changed significantly since World War I. The US Army did not have a published staff doctrine or guidance to assist commanders in the decision making process. The Regulations for Field Maneuvers (1910), did not provide staff guidance. In 1914, the field service regulation (FSR) identified the need for decision making processes. The Staff Officer Field Manual (1932), complied principles, data, and information that was intended to guide the operations of staff of all units and territorial commands. The Staff Officer Field Manual (1932), was a detailed manual that explained staff functions and more complete commander estimates of implementation time.
The Military Decision Making Process (MDMP) is a decision-making model to assist military members in making sound military decisions and to compile operation orders. This paper will describe MDMP and apply it to a recent job-related decision of the author; preparation for a combat logistics patrol (CLP) while deployed in Iraq. The paper will identify the steps in the model and describe how critical thinking impacted the decision.
Mission analysis - Commander defines tactical problems and brainstorms possible solutions. This consists of 17 steps. The staff brief commander. Anticipation, trained staff, and preparation are primary to this stage.
Bassham, G., Irwin, W., Nardone, H., & Wallace, J. (2002). Critical Thinking. [University of Phoenix Custom Edition e-text]. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Publishing. Retrieved August 25, 2004 from University of Phoenix, Resource, MGT/350–Critical Thinking: Strategies in Decision Making Web site: https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/resource.asp
Military leaders make decisions and solve problems every day. Some need a decision quickly while others can take time. The US Army has several decision-making methods to assist leaders. The Army Problem Solving Model (Process) is a systematic approach to identifying the best possible solution to an issue or problem and a deliberate method of decision-making. (FM 6-0, 2009) Leaders use it to solve a problem when time is not critical and they can put some thought into different solutions. The solution must be objective and based on facts in order for the decision to be relevant and practical. The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process is a decision-making and synchronization technique typically used during the execution
The United States Army has implemented models called the Troop Leading Procedures (TLPs) and the Operations Process in order to facilitate a commander 's capacity to effectively and efficiently organize a task. When these models are executed together, they create a framework for leaders at various levels to excel in any situations they might encounter. Understanding the significance of the relationship between these models requires an in-depth understanding of each of them specifically. Each step of the Troop Leading Procedures contains numerous factors which reflect upon the other steps as well as the entire Operations Process. Likewise, each aspect of the Operations Process profoundly influences the decisions made throughout the TLPs. When applied together correctly, the Operations Process and Troop Leading Procedures provide a structure for strong and adaptable operational leadership.
Initiative. The army is a very good organisation for allowing its personnel to use their initiative. All soldiers are told and trained to use their initiative, as this is one of the qualities their superiors are looking for when considering a person for promotion and career progression.
There are many different strategies that good problem solvers use to solve a problem. The steps of the problem solving process are systematic and organized. First, take your time and identify the problem very carefully. Do the research, and become informed about your subject. Few good problem solvers solve problems fast. Life choices need to be supported with well thought-out
As military members we are educated to think very linearly about strategy. For many years we have been trained to have a strategic thought process based on the use of a methodology that espouses three major steps: Ends (Objectives), Ways (Strategic Concepts), and Means (Resources). (Barber 1997)