preview

Compare And Contrast Illinois Constitution Vs Federal Constitution

Decent Essays

Illinois Constitution V. Federal Constitution “The Constitution is the guide which I never will abandon,” is a famous quote from the first President of the United States, George Washington. An interesting fact about the Illinois and the Federal Constitution is how, Ilinois had 4 constitutions while the Federal government had only one constitution that can be amended. Another interesting fact is how the Federal Constitution has 4,543 words, while the Illinois Constitution has 34,362 words. The Illinois and the Federal Constitution have many similarities and differences, among the Legislative Branch, the lawmaking process, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. First, the differences and similarities of the state legislative branch and …show more content…

Now, the differences of the state and federal constitutions for the legislative branch will be stated and explained. The first difference is how, “The Senate has 100 members: two from each of the 50 states… The House of Representatives has 435 members from various states (Federal)...There are 59 state senators...There are 118 state representatives (Illinois),” (pg. 16-58). It is important for the federal senate and house of representatives to have more representatives because _________________________________. The next difference is the qualifications. The qualifications for a U.S senator are how, “a senator must be at least 30 years old, a United States citizen for at least nine years, and a resident of the state he/she is representing,” (pg. 17). The qualifications for a U.S representative are how, “a representative must be at least 25 years of age, a U.S citizen for at least seven years, and an inhabitant of the state he/she represents,” (pg. 18). And the qualifications for an Illinois senator or representative are how, “each member, must be 21 years or older, a resident of the district for two years, and a citizen.” (pg. 58). The different qualifications serve an important purpose. Because the U.S …show more content…

The first similarity is how, “Lobbies are controlled by the law and most operate legally (Federal)...most of these lobbies operate legally under the laws controlling them (Illinois),”(pg. 22-58). This is very important because this shows that both of the governments have lobbies that almost all follow the law and are legal. The next similarity is how, “...it is sent to the president, who can either sign it or veto it (Federal)...the governor can then sign it or veto it (Illinois),” (pg. 20-59). This is a very important part in the lawmaking process (which happens to be the same in both constitutions), because it is what passes the bill to the judicial branch, or it is what makes the bill go back to the legislative branch. The last similarity is how, “In both houses of Congress, no business may be transacted without a quorum (Federal)... in the General Assembly a majority must be present or no decisions can be made (Illinois),” (pg. 20-59). It is important for a majority/quorum to be present in both constitutions because in order to carry out any bill, it needs to get a fair vote, 50% + 1. Now, the differences of the state and federal constitutions for the lawmaking process will be stated and explained. The first difference is how, “the two houses of Congress may try to override the president’s veto by a ⅔ vote in each house (Federal)...if

Get Access