CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODS
This chapter discusses the methods used in the study. It consists of research design, data and data source, data collection and data analysis.
3.1 Research Design This study uses descriptive qualitative as a research design. The aim of this study is to describe the apology strategies by Lehrer on his plagiarism scandal in 2013. The writer uses qualitative approach because it deals with the natural phenomena of apology strategies used by Jonah Lehrer on his apology speech. This study is included into document or content analysis because it analyzed the utterances produced by Lehrer.
Moreover, this study belongs to descriptive qualitative method because it describes the type of apology strategies and connotative words taken from someone’s utterance. The core of the research is about the process and its meaning.
3.2 Data and Data Source The data of this study
…show more content…
Therefore, there are some steps in analyzing the data. First, the writer identifies the types of apology strategies used by Lehrer. Second, the writer identifies categories and subcategories of apology strategies. Third, the writer classifies types of apology strategies by putting tables to give a detail data concerning the number of apology strategies on the types, categories and subcategories. Fourth, the writer analyzes the sentences in Lehrer’s speech by interpreting each sentence which is uttered by Lehrer on his apology speech regarding the connotation theory that proposed by Leech (1974) to know how the connotative words help repairing his reputation. Fifth, the writer looks at the key words on each utterance and interprets them. Sixth, the writer presents the table containing comparison between denotative and connotative meaning of each word. Last, the writer makes conclusion based on research
This chapter covers the background and rationale, statement of the opportunity, purpose, research questions, nature of the study, definition of key terms, the significance of the study, assumptions, and limitations. It also covers the scope, worldview and theoretical foundation depicting the logical path of the research study.
Thesis: Betrayal leads to feeling of guilt which forces the person in search of redemption either directly or through indirect actions and gestures.
This analytical and evaluative essay aims to answer this question from multiple dimensions. It will first investigate the social background in which the speech was situated and then examine the organization and structure of the speech text. After that, it will
Unacknowledged Shame Theory is seen in a perspective that shame can cause a destructive emotion and can promote crime instead of preventing it if it is not managed positively. By using apology in return for forgiveness symbolises that reparation can commence (Braithwaite, 2004).
Saying ¨I am sorry¨ is not all, the key element is to forgive. The seven-lettered word might be hard for some to pronounce,yet it is the most essential weapon to fight pride. While it causes the liberation of feelings inside a person, it ,likewise, is the resolving of a sociocultural problem, pride and honor, among various types of people.
Individuals use unnecessary apologies to please one another in order to avoid feeling like undesirable situations are their fault, but must learn to stop taking the blame and stand up for themselves. In fact, many people conceive an apology as “self-depreciating” or an “automatic way of keeping both
In, “The ‘F’ Word” by Firoozeh Dumas, the author explains her and her family’s difficulties moving to a new place. She just wanted to fit in and not have people make fun of her like her brothers. She wrote the narrative essay to inform her readers that everything comes with its difficulties but sometimes you just have to do whatever it takes to overcome them. She showed many examples of Rhetorical strategies throughout the essay, she uses ethos, pathos, compare and contrast. She showed many examples of Rhetorical strategies throughout the essay like ethos.
Pennycook’s essay “Borrowing Others’ Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism” starts with a description of the incident that a student wrote some paragraphs of the high school textbooks into the essay. The first node appears after the description of the trigger, followed by the detailed analysis of how the historical notions of ownership and authorship have evolved from the premodern to the modern era (Pennycook, 203). This node which alters the discourse from the portrayal of the studying motivation to the exploration of the historical and cultural factors in depth highlights the importance and necessity of the exploration.
They point out that assumptions are based on our own feelings. For example, if we feel hurt, then the other person must have meant to hurt us. Furthermore, we should acknowledge the hurt feelings of the other, even if this was not our intent. The final component of the “what happened” conversation is the problem with the assignment of blame, which inhibits the ability to learn about the cause of the problem or to collaborate to fix it. The authors remind us that “…blame is about judging and contribution is about understanding (p. 59).” Attention should be focused on examining each person’s contribution to the problem with a goal of understanding cause and avoiding future problems. An effective “what happened” conversation illuminates the fact that the situation is more complex than either party’s original perception. Next, the authors discuss the importance of having a “feelings” conversation. Although emotions frequently drive difficult conversations, people often ignore them. However, unaddressed feelings generally re-emerge to impair understanding, hinder listening, and damage relationships. Although feelings do not always make sense, they still exist and require acceptance, so that both parties can feel understood. The third conversation is one that we have with ourselves about what this situation means about our personal identity. We may question our competence, goodness, or
Secondly, because of the special audience they have, their language style is also distinctive. The tone of the article is official and serious due to the situation of being present in a worldwide famous conference in Beijing. The style is best defined by their special rhetorical dictions,
1. What does your word choice say about you? What if you did not say anything? These are some of the questions that I can help you answer by the end of your reading. In this paper, I will cover how Americans communicate verbally, nonverbally, and whether we use direct or indirect communication in our American culture. While understanding the topics that we will go over in this paper, it is imperative that we begin with the most familiar methods that we as Americans use daily, verbal and nonverbal communications.
The person either receives forgiveness or punishment according to the magnitude of their mistake and finally, correction of the mistake is done like the Vicario twins had to kill Santiago to restore their lost honor. Since declaring culpability takes courage, it also results in more confident people who earn respect for their behavior of being
Negative emotions selfishly nudge a place to overwhelm the mind and heart, lacking merciful speech practices. The agony which is delivered as a result of the union of lies and deceit, becomes multiplied, in situations, when the offender, act as if they did, or said, nothing to warrant a wounding reaction from the intended victim.
First of all, would like to express my gratitude to Almighty God, for the kindness and the great blessing that was given to me, so that lead of completion of this paper entitled “Taboo words in “What Came Before He Shot Her” Novel by Elizabeth George”. This paper was written with the aim to obtaining the undergraduate degree at the English Department. This paper could not be completed if there was no support of many people and there was almost no proper word that the writer can convey to express gratitude and respect from that help and contribution.
The thesis is rooted in qualitative interpretivist ideology adopting the inductive and hermeneutic paradigm. It views the subject through the lens of the people being studied as hermeneutic phenomenology focuses on the subjective experience of individuals and groups. Hermeneutic process attempt to show the world as experienced by the subject through his/her life world stories. This school of thought advances that interpretations are all we have and description itself is an interpretive process.