Background question: Suppose there is a nonrenewable resource with inverse demand function p= 30-0.8q and with marginal extraction costs (MEC)= 8. The resource stock, S is finite and = 35 units. Suppose the time horizon is 2 periods and the discount rate is r= 8%. What quantity should be extracted in each period? What is the optimal price of the resource in the 2 periods? Please answer this!Following Hotelling, we might expect the real price of nonrenewable resources to increase continually over time, as resource stocks are depleted. But empirical evidence for a number of nonrenewable (mineral) resources indicates that their prices over the past century have not been increasing monotonically. Instead the price paths for a number of nonrenewable resources have been “U-shaped”. Provide an explanation for what’s going on. i.e. resolve this apparent anomaly between theory and observation- why would the price of these resources be driven down instead of increasing as the theory predicts?

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Chapter2: Fundamental Economic Concepts
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 2E
icon
Related questions
Question

Background question: Suppose there is a nonrenewable resource with inverse demand function p= 30-0.8q and with marginal extraction costs (MEC)= 8. The resource stock, S is finite and = 35 units. Suppose the time horizon is 2 periods and the discount rate is r= 8%. What quantity should be extracted in each period? What is the optimal price of the resource in the 2 periods?

Please answer this!Following Hotelling, we might expect the real price of nonrenewable resources to increase continually over time, as resource stocks are depleted. But empirical evidence for a number of nonrenewable (mineral) resources indicates that their prices over the past century have not been increasing monotonically. Instead the price paths for a number of nonrenewable resources have been “U-shaped”. Provide an explanation for what’s going on. i.e. resolve this apparent anomaly between theory and observation- why would the price of these resources be driven down instead of increasing as the theory predicts?

Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Present Discounted Value
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning