To evaluate: Whether there is any chance of spending resources on creating real assets in an efficient way than just rearranging them and highlight some benefits earned by creating an array of derivative securities using primary securities.
Introduction:
Real assets: Assets which have a physical form can be justified as “real assets”. Money invested in purchase of real assets proves beneficial as it has inherent worth due to its properties. Few examples of real assets are building, land, machinery and plant etc.
Explanation of Solution
First of all, basis of financial engineering can be referred to as a program where finance and investment related aspects are dealt with using mathematical techniques. In other words, it is a platform which is a bunch of financial theory, engineering methods, various mathematical tools and programming techniques. Normally it contains a lot of paper shuffling.
Even though all financial assets are good, it cannot be assumed that all financial assets work the same way. If financial assets like bonds, stocks or mortgages are considered, it is found that these assets have their own payment format. The risks and the returns earned also differ accordingly For instance, consider government bonds and mortgage loans, both have particular payment format but with a difference − government bonds make coupon payments semi- annually while mortgage loans have a facility of being prepaid. When it comes to borrowing, sometimes the government borrows money with risks on reinvestment and people having an intention of buying a home may borrow money with zero prepayment and risks applicable by default.
Whatever the situation may be, the financial engineering products work better on financial underlying assets. But still investment in real assets is worthy as sometimes risk factor involved is less. The concept of more risk, more profit plays significant role in making a decision.
As concluded that the investment in real assets is worthy as sometimes risk factor involved in real assets is less.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Financial theory (and the narrative in the textbook) indicates that NPV is the theoretically correct method to use to evaluate capital investments. Yet, surveys of financial managers consistently indicate that IRR is the most widely used technique by practitioners. Why do you suppose this discrepancy exists?arrow_forwardWhy is it important that in an underwriting the investment banker does not overvalue (overprice) or undervalued (underprice) the securities? If the securities are overpriced or underpriced, who suffers the loss? Discuss with illustrations.arrow_forwardWhich of the following is NOT true? You might be better off using elimination approach for this question if your other courses (Financial Management, Investment/Portfolio Management) did not familiarize yourself with the concept of risk-neutrality. In risk-neutral valuation the risk-free rate is used to discount expected cash flows In risk-neutral valuation the expected return on all investment assets is set equal to the risk-free rate O Derivatives can be valued based on the assumption that investors are risk neutral O Risk-neutral valuation provides prices that are only correct in a world where investors are risk-neutral None of these (i.e. all are TRUE)arrow_forward
- Asymmetric information makes it hard for investors to sell securities. Banks, meaning both investment and commercial, specialize in reducing asymmetric information. What methods do they have for reducing information asymmetries? Be sure to specify if the methods are designed to reduce the problems of adverse selection or moral hazard.arrow_forwardSome accountants believe that financial statement analysis is of little benefit as it contradicts the findings of capital markets research. Discuss the findings of capital markets research and its implications for financial statement analysis.arrow_forward. The Capital asset Pricing Model (CAPM) contends that there is systematic & unsystematic risk for an individual security. Which is the relevant risk variable & why it’s relevant?arrow_forward
- Why is it important that in an underwriting the investment banker does not overvalue (overprice) or undervalue (underprice) the securities? If the securities are overpriced or underpriced, who suffers the loss?arrow_forwardThe efficient market hypothesis says that Multiple Choice market prices reflect underlying asset values. individual investors should not participate in the financial markets. investors should expect to earn abnormal profits. financial managers can accurately time stock and bond sales. creative accounting can be used to inflate stock prices.arrow_forwardAccording to Capital Asset Pricing theory (CAPM), in a competitive marketplace: Group of answer choices A. only systematic risk is rewarded. B. only diversifiable risk is rewarded. C. all types of risks are rewarded. D. no risk is rewarded.arrow_forward
- Securitized paper: Multiple Choice is not part of the money market. is off balance sheet financing. is guaranteed by security firms. is backed by a variety of assets.arrow_forwardMany firms still use the internal rate of return rule instead of net present value. When used properly, the two rules lead to the same decision, but the internal rate of return rule has several pitfalls that can trap the unwary.Explain with reasons, THREE (3) pitfalls of using the internal rate of return rule in appraising capital investment.arrow_forwardHow does the equity method discourage the manipulation of net income by investors?arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningEBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT