Concept explainers
Controversy tends to surround the topic of whistleblowers. For example, should they be considered heroes or traitors? Many pro-whistleblowing policies have been enacted by the federal government to allow these individuals to reap significant monetary rewards for coming forward and giving information about behaviors and actions such as corporate fraud and unethical deeds. Many corporate whistleblowers face negative consequences of their actions, such as reassignment, revenge, and hate crimes, and are seen as traitors (e.g., Edward Snowden and Gina Gray). Yet Sherron Watkins and Cynthia Cooper were celebrated as heroes. Look up the stories of Sherron Watkins and Cynthia Cooper. Why do you think that some whistleblowers are vilified and others made to be heroes?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 1 Solutions
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Financial Accounting (12th Edition) (What's New in Accounting)
Intermediate Accounting
Cost Accounting (15th Edition)
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (16th Edition)
Construction Accounting And Financial Management (4th Edition)
Financial Accounting, Student Value Edition (4th Edition)
- A code of ethics is an important element of a fraud prevention program. Which of the following would diminish the effectiveness of a company’s code of conduct?a. The establishment of a chief ethics officer.b. The establishment of a hotline for reporting unethical behavior.c. The violation of the code of ethics by senior management.d. The posting of the code of ethics in the company workplace.arrow_forwardSenior executives cannot be criminally prosecuted for the wrong doings they commit on behalf of the companies where they work. Group of answer choices True Falsearrow_forwardUnethical acts are generally committed by unethical people. What are some things companies can do to help ensure that their employees act ethically?arrow_forward
- During an internal investigation, Black, a Certified Fraud Examiner, interviewed Green, a fraud suspect. Although Green wanted to leave in the middle of the interview, Black blocked the exit and prevented him from leaving. Green subsequently confessed to committing fraud. If, under these facts, Green files a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Black, Black will likely: A. Win the case because the qualified business privilege protects investigators conducting internal investigations. B. Win the case because Green confessed to the fraud. C. Lose the case if a trier of fact concludes that he restrained Green without consent or legal justification. D. Lose the cans because Green did not leave the interview.arrow_forwardMost employees that choose to commit fraud against their employers feel justified in doing so. For example, if an employee gets demoted and has to take a pay cut or doesn't get a raise or bonus for a given year, that employee may feel justified in taking what is referred to "wages in kind." Wages in kind is where the employee creates his or her own wages. What might a company do to prevent an employee from taking "wages in kind?"arrow_forwardBriefly describe some of the common themes or pressures faced by executives who commitcorporate fraud.arrow_forward
- Principles of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax CollegeBusiness/Professional Ethics Directors/Executives...AccountingISBN:9781337485913Author:BROOKSPublisher:Cengage
- EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENTBusiness Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:CengageManagerial Accounting: The Cornerstone of Busines...AccountingISBN:9781337115773Author:Maryanne M. Mowen, Don R. Hansen, Dan L. HeitgerPublisher:Cengage Learning