Macroeconomics
13th Edition
ISBN: 9781337617390
Author: Roger A. Arnold
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 21.1, Problem 1ST
To determine
The favorable terms of trade between Country U and Country UK
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
The table below for the United States and Mexico shows maximum feasible production rates per acre of wheat if no rice is produced and maximum feasible production rates per acre of rice if no
wheat are produced. Assume that the opportunity costs of producing these goods are constant in both countries.
Output per Acre with Trade
Wheat
80 tons
United States
Mexico
55 tons
For the United States, the opportunity cost of 1 ton of wheat is tons of rice. (Enter your response rounded to two decimal places.)
has a comparative advantage in wheat, and
has a comparative advantage in rice.
Now consider the following table that shows the production and consumption of wheat and rice if there is no trade.
Output per Acre with No Trade
Wheat
40.0 tons
27.5 tons
United States
Mexico
Total output of wheat if the two countries do not trade
tons. (Enter your response rounded to one decimal place.)
Total output of rice if the two countries do not trade
tons. (Enter your response rounded to one decimal place)…
Happyland can produce 40 tones of marshmallows or 20 tones of chocolate in a year. Friendshipland can produce 80 tones of marshmallows or 40 tones of chocolate in a year. Can these countries benefit from trade with each other based on specialization and comparative advantage?
Yes
No
Suppose that a worker in Freedonia can produce either 6 units of corn or 4 units of wheat per year, and a worker in Sylvania can produce either 4 units of corn or 6 units of wheat per year. Each nation has 10 workers. For many years the two countries traded, each completely specializing in producing the grain for which it has a comparative advantage. Now, however, war has broken out between them and all trade has stopped. Without trade, Freedonia produces and consumes 30 units of corn and 20 units of wheat per year. Sylvania produces and consumes 20 units of corn and 30 units of wheat. By how much has the combined yearly output of the two countries declined?
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Suppose Country A can produce 200 tons of capital-intensive goods or 200 tons of labor-intensive goods in one day. Suppose Country B can produce 80 tons of capital-intensive goods or 160 tons of labor-intensive goods in one day. What is one possible price of capital-intensive goods (in terms of labor-intensive goods) that would make BOTH countries better off as the result of trade?arrow_forwardWhen a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods.arrow_forwardConsider an international trade model consisting of three countries X, Y, and Z. Suppose X uses domestically, sends of its production to Y, and sends of its production to Z. Suppose Y uses domestically, sends of its production to X, and sends of its production to Z. Suppose Z uses sends of its production to X and sends of its production to Y. Assume this is a closed Leontief model. If we know country Z produced 28 thousand units of goods, then country X produces country Y produces thousand units of goods. of its production of its production of its domestic goods, thousand units of goods andarrow_forward
- In Country T, it takes 10 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 13.5 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. In Country Y, it takes 40 resources to produce 1 ton of cocoa and 20 resources to produce 1 ton of rice. Country T has a comparative advantage over Country Y in cocoa. This follows the theory of comparative advantage, and we can say that engaging in free trade benefits all countries that participate in it; however, this conclusion stems from which of these inaccurate assumptions? Multiple Choice We have assumed constant returns to scale. We have assumed the prices of resources and exchange rates in the two countries are dynamic. We have assumed there are barriers to the movement of resources from the production of one good to another within the same country. We have assumed that agrarian nations do not specialize in producing particular products. We have assumed diminishing returns to specialization.arrow_forwardSuppose that a worker in Caninia can produce either 2 blankets or 8 meals per day, and a worker in Felinia can produce either 5 blankets or 1 meal per day. Each nation has 10 workers. For many years, the two countries traded, each completely specializing according to their respective comparative advantages. Now war has broken out between them and all trade has stopped. Without trade, Caninia produces and consumes 10 blankets and 40 meals per day and Felinia produces and consumes 25 blankets and 5 meals per day. The war has caused the combined daily output of the two countries to decline by __________?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc