Concept explainers
The uncertainty product
Answer to Problem 11P
The uncertainty product
Explanation of Solution
Formula used:
The expression for ground state of harmonic motion is given by,
The wave function for ground state is,
Calculation:
The expression for ground state of harmonic motion is calculated as,
Let,
Then,
For the limits,
The expectation value for
For the limits,
By definition of Gamma function,
Then,
The uncertainty in position is calculated as,
Further simplify the above,
The uncertainty in momentum is calculated as,
Further simplify the above,
Multiply equation (1) and (2).
Conclusion:
Therefore, the product
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 35 Solutions
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
- Given that, the expectation value of r2 is the inner product (²qb}, find the expectation value of r2arrow_forwardFind the expectation value of the kinetic energy for the particle in the state, (x,t)=Aei(kxt). What conclusion can you draw from your solution?arrow_forwardProblem 3 For = [-1,2] and X(@) = w? - 1, find expressions for Fx(x) and fx(x) assuming that probability measure on 2 is the Lebesgue measure scaled by 1/3.arrow_forward
- A ID harmonic oscillator of angular frequency w and charge q is in its ground state at time t=0. A perturbation H'(t) = qE eA3 (where E is ekctric field and ß is a constant) is %3D applied for a time t = t. Cakulate the probability of transition to the first and second excited state. (hint: you may expand exponential in perturbation and keep it only up to linear term)arrow_forwardFind the energy values of the first three levels of this well using the finite difference method. Plot the corresponding wave functions. The effective mass of m* given for the well Agree that it also applies to barriers. The material of the barrier is not important here. Important is the V0 potential.arrow_forwardUsing the nomalization constant A( nd the value of a evaluste the probability to find an escillator in the ground state 2h beyond the classical tuming points This problem cannot be solved in dlosed, analytic form. Develop an approximate, numerical method using a graph calculator, or computer. Assume an electron bound to an atomic-sized region (-0.1 m) with an effective force constant of 1.0 eVm. (To be marked comect, you must be within 25% of the corect answer)arrow_forward
- Find the energy values of the first three levels of this well using the finite difference method. Plot the corresponding wave functions. Effective masses are different in wells and barriers. The V0 potential was calculated according to the ? concentration.arrow_forwardAn electron is in a finite square well that is 0.6 eV deep, and 2.1 nm wide. Calculate the value of the dimensionless potential (to 3 s.f).arrow_forwardAn electron is trapped in a finite well. How “far” (in eV) is it from being free (that is, no longer trapped inside the well) if the penetration length of its wave function into the classically forbidden region is 1nm? Show derivation on how to find the correct equation to use, from doing this the answer should be 0.038eV.arrow_forward
- One-dimensional harmonic oscillators in equilibrium with a heat bath (a) Calculate the specific heat of the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator as a function of temperature. (b) Plot the T -dependence of the mean energy per particle E/N and the specific heat c. Show that E/N → kT at high temperatures for which kT > hw. This result corresponds to the classical limit and is shown to be an example of the equipartition theorem. In this limit the energy kT is large in comparison to ħw, the separation between energy levels. Hint: expand the exponential function 1 ē = ħw + eBhw (c) Show that at low temperatures for which ħw> kT , E/N = hw(+e-Bhw) What is the value of the heat capacity? Why is the latter so much smaller than it is in the high temperature limit? Why is this behavior different from that of a two-state system? (d) Verify that S →0 as T> O in agreement with the third law of thermodynamics, and that at high T,S> kN In(kT / hw).arrow_forwardCalculate ,,,, 0x,and Op, for the nth stationary state of the infinite square well. Check that the uncertainty principle is satisfied. Which state comes closest to the uncertainty limit?arrow_forwardWe can finally calculate the uncertainty in the axial distance using the relation where o, is the uncertainty in r. Find the uncertainty in the axial distance of the particle's location.arrow_forward
- Modern PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781111794378Author:Raymond A. Serway, Clement J. Moses, Curt A. MoyerPublisher:Cengage LearningClassical Dynamics of Particles and SystemsPhysicsISBN:9780534408961Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. MarionPublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics Volume 3PhysicsISBN:9781938168185Author:William Moebs, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax