Eddie Bauer Case Analysis
I. Strategy Upon Emerging from Bankruptcy Protection, Key Success and Risk Factors
After emerging from bankruptcy in 2005, Eddie Bauer had to take several strategic steps to establish an effective direction of the company and operate more successfully. Management’s plan of reorganization identified six key strategic initiatives that can be classified into two main groups. The first component of their strategy is to improve profitability by both increasing demand through effective marketing campaigns (brand revitalization, resizing of stores, and improving customer experience) and cutting costs (store rationalization, increasing direct sales, and optimizing productivity). The second component of their strategy is
…show more content…
housing market. In order to increase sales, Eddie Bauer must grab a significant market share from its competitors, which is a difficult task in this industry. However, progress in sales and market share will become more complicated if the slow growth of the industry remains unchanged. Thus, one of the company’s key success factors in increasing profitability is to reposition its brand in the market as a premium brand, which would require an effective advertising campaign, changes to store layout and location, and increased customer experience. However, it does not fully guarantee that the company will be successful in repositioning its brand from its old brand positioning that lasted for many decades. Moreover, it is uncertain that a premium brand for the modern outdoor lifestyle would satisfy the ever-changing taste of consumers; thereby, posing a risk for the company. Although management of Eddie Bauer identified optimal store sizes and locations in line with its new strategy, this success factor will heavily rely on the availability of retail space and the ability to re-negotiate existing …show more content…
Advertising expenses are included as part of SG&A in the income statement. Additionally, attracting top management talent will further increase the company’s expenditure on SG&A since they have to incentive individuals to join such a company that has recently emerged from the bankruptcy. Based on projections, Eddie Bauer expected that SG&A as a percentage of net sales will decrease from 37.6% in 2004 to 34.3% in 2008, indicating a deviation from economic reality, regardless of expected operational efficiencies. Eddie Bauer would need to maintain its SG&A percentage to run new marketing campaigns and attract top talent. Eddie Bauer may be understanding its assumptions about how much it needs to invest to drive these strategic initiatives. Thus, it would be more appropriate to increase SG&A to around 40% of net sales to account for these large expenditures. Next important metric would be based on the company’s intent to resize to an optimal store size of 5,500 square feet as mentioned in the case. It is helpful to compare the company’s sales per square foot with top 10 comparable companies in the retail industry to determine whether Eddie Bauer’s projections are aligned with economic reality. Eddie Bauer is approximated to have 1.975 million square feet in retail space in 2006. Thus, Eddie Bauer should expect to attain retail
Macy Inc. (M) has a cost structure that can best be viewed using SWOT analysis, which is a way of evaluating the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to the corporation. Macy’s strengths include customer loyalty, a recognizable store name, use of technology, a substantial supply chain, its comprehensive size, and the locations of its stores. In total, these strengths enable Macy Inc. to provide a unique service that offers a characteristic their competitors do not have: merchandise tailored to the customer by store and climate zone. Macy’s main weakness is its cost structure: costs are high compared to their competitors due to a complete operational transformation that includes localizing merchandise by
When it comes to warehouse-style club stores, there are really only four names out there: Costco, Sam’s Club, Wal-Mart and BJ’s. This paper will discuss the Costco and BJ’s. The different type of strategies being utilized by each company, the purpose of the financial statements, their Vertical & Horizontal analysis, how each financial rations ties into the two company’s strategies, Solvency & Performance for each company, a SWOT analysis of each company and finally if the expectations of the stakeholders of each company are being met.
The industry we have chosen is the department store-retail industry. Within this industry, we have chosen the department stores of JCPenney and Macy’s. We find this industry, as well as these two companies, interesting from a strategic perspective. JCPenney has recently undergone a massive strategic restructuring in regards to its pricing, brand offerings, and store layout, pushing it away from the typical department store strategy of discounts and coupons. Its new strategy has become much closer to Wal-Mart’s strategy of every day low prices. Macy’s, on the other hand, has restructured with a push from the economic
The biggest challenge that they face as a company is they do not have the room the increase expenditure by such a vast amount. Currently there is $3,675,000 in promotional dollars allocated as follows; sales and administration expense (995,000), cooperative advertising programs with retailers (1,650,000), consumer advertising (562,000) and trade promotion (467,000). adding the $225,000 increase in consumer advertising will not allow the 5% of expected sales for total promo expenditures. John Bott, the vice president of sales disagreed with the budget allocation and noted that sales expenses and administration cost were projected to be $65,000 in 2008. This led him to believe that an additional sales representative would be needed to service company accounts because 50 were being added. Therefore he estimated this addition would cost at least $70,000 including salary and expenses in 2008. Bott also stated that “That's about $135,000 in additional sales expense that have to be added to our promotional budget for 2008”
Combined with both advertising and more items available in retail, the sales is forecast to increase at 5% for the 1st year at $27M (Table 9) since brand building is a long term strategy and we cannot expect miracles only after several campaigns. On I-media, Eddie Bauer should implement more promotion campaigns and new-items launch date. It should gradually shift more information from catalog to I-Media since its cost of developing selling information is lower than printing content for catalog. Both professional and higher quality elements should be added to the I-Media since 50% of I-media customers are affluent male who are looking for quality to fit their life style. To increase the brand synergy, more women’s items or feminine visuals could be added on the front page
Dicks Sporting Good is the largest and most profitable publicly held specialty sporting goods retailer in the nation. In 2012, they strengthened their competitive position by expanding their store network, enhancing the customers shopping environment, growing their own private brand portfolio and upgrading several of their key technology systems. They have also set the stage for future growth by opening a fourth distribution center, breaking new ground with the “Untouchable” marketing campaign and fueling the market research engine by testing new retail concepts. For the last three years the store profits grew tremendously. The initiatives drove sales up and they were able in 2012 to have $345 million in cash and cash equivalents and no outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility (DKS Annual
The purpose of this paper is to advise analyze the financial statements of Dillard’s, Inc. in order to recommend whether or not my client should invest $1 million in the large retail company. I will compare the financial statements of Dillard’s, Inc. its competitor, Kohl’s Corporation. Investing in retail can be risky because a retail company’s performance is very heavily influenced by factors that have nothing to do with the actual company such as the overall performance of the economy or the weather during the holiday shopping season. There is, however, potential for profitability within the retail sector. Based on my analysis, I recommend that the client should not invest in Dillard’s, Inc. for the following reasons. First, Dillard’s has experience a decline in net income in the last three years. Second, liquidity ratios indicate that they could face possible liquidity constraints in the future. Third, long-term debt paying ability ratios indicate that the company could have trouble paying off the principal of its current debt obligations. Fourth, the profitability ratios are well below industry averages, suggesting that there are more profitable companies to invest in within the industry. And finally, Investor analysis ratios provide mixed opinion of the future performance of the company. I conclude that retail can be a profitable industry to invest in if an investor has the risk tolerance and risk capacity to withstand the uncertainty, but neither Dillard’s
The companies that were chosen for a company analysis include Macy’s, Kohl’s, and Burlington. Since the retail industry has been lagging behind lately, these companies will help determine the prospective financial investment in the retail industry. As Macy’s as our primary company, we chose Kohl’s and Burlington to be the two comparative companies. These companies are comparable due to the same SIC code of 5311 in the subgroup of department stores. These companies offer similar products and services with little differentiation between the three.
In the early 2000’s Lowe’s was rapidly intensifying its presence nationwide. The company carried a varied assortment of home improvement products and catered to the needs of retail as well as commercial business customers. Lowe’s expanded their reach by acquiring a 41-store chain, Eagle Hardware and Garden, and engaging in a strategic alliance with HGTV to obtain a more profound existence in their market (Rouse, 2005). By 2004, Lowe’s operated almost 1,000 stores with plans to continue expansion across the nation (Rouse, 2005). The company has a core competency in helping customers meet their home improvement needs at a low price. In order to use this core competency to gain a competitive advantage, the company has focused on key
1. Evaluate Family Dollar’s retail strategy. Will it work in both good and bad economic times?
Through the dozens of merchandise sections within these departments, the company is able to offer customers one-stop shopping convenience in addition to the company operating a dairy, bakery, kitchen, and photo plan. These functional approaches incorporate the fundamental concept of integration with combining and coordinating products and services to offer the consumers one-stop shopping (Smith &Albaum, 2005). This type of marketing and operational strategiesprovides the company an advantage in multiple areas of business while contributing to the organization’s direction and mission. Fred Meyer’s organizational structures are effective in the company’s strategy of seeking competitiveness by enabling each department and each product division in response to the local competition with marketing and operational strategies. The position of the company is measuredby concepts of awareness, use, share, and competitive evaluation in determining the appropriate organizational structure to achieve the goals of the organization. This position of the company impacts the organizational functions in accordance to the organizational design and organizational structure. The operational and marketing functions performed by Fred Meyer reflect qualities of the organization geared toward the appropriate organizational design to achieve the direction of the company.
Customers make purchasing decisions based on the information they have among products and the values of goods a company offers. For that reason, companies have to promote their products to increase products awareness. In order to achieve organizational goals, companies must understand the market’s needs to ensure the success of their businesses. Such information can be gained through research. The industry that will form the basis of this paper is Western Canadian Shoe Association. The three brands under study are Reebok, Adidas, and Nike.
Based on the sales manager’s research, he predicted 2,200,000 yards to be sold. In our financial model, we factored in a 7% increase in the average price per yard and a 10% increase in the average cost per yard, both of which the sales manager projected with confidence. The key underlying assumption this lead to was a 12.90% increase in revenue. Next, we averaged the past four years SG&A margin (SG&A/Sales) because this will serve as an adequate proxy for the forecasted SG&A expense. Although 2004 SG&A expense was an anomaly, we felt that it must be calculated in the average to accommodate for any shifting trends towards higher SG&A costs. Calculating interest expense was simple because we were given that Alliance Concrete pays 8.5% on outstanding debt. Our assumption for the tax rate came from the average tax rate the firm has paid out over the past 4 years, which was 34.81%.
Over the past twenty-five years we have had to reinvent ourselves many times. The first surge was with the Waffle Trainer and the running craze. When that slowed, we thought we ran out of market. We had another surge with basketball behind Michael Jordan, and cross-training with Bo Jackson. Then again, we Thought our growth was dead. Another surge came in 1995, when Nike became fashionable and athletic urban wear became king. But,that too ended in early 2008, as did the health of the Asian economy. There we were, with an over-extended brand. Each time we reinvented our company. In 1995, when we reached $3 billion in sales, we said $5 billion was the absolute limit. Three years later we were closing in on $10 billion. Each time we did succeed it was due, in part, to
In the base case, we assumed 11.0% compounded annual growth rate. This is based on modest growth in domestic sales, and optimistic expectations for the international, Babies R Us, and online sales. Online sales can save relevant costs of physical display of products and associated costs of running a store. EBITDA margin is assumed higher and will be higher in the near future as the sales grow. Capital expenditure and depreciation amortization expenses are assumed fairly constant over the years . Overall operation will generate enough cash to support debt and interest payments. If Toys R Us would be able to specialize some of baby products, video games and