This essay presents a critique of a peer-reviewed article, Beccue, B., Vila, J., & Whitley, L. (2001). The effects of adding audio instructions to a multimedia computer based training environment, which utilises quantitative research methods. In this research study, the researchers clearly state what the main purpose of the study is, which was “to determine if the addition of an audio component had an effect on the learning and attitudes of the students” (p. 50). In this case, therefore, the principal question under investigation is whether or not incorporation of audio instructions improves the quantity of materials retained within the multimedia laboratory. Additionally, the researchers go deeper to establish if the introduction of the …show more content…
Further to this, the research sufficiently states the research aims, as stipulated by Wells and Stage (2015) regarding quality research studies. Research Description This journal employs a quantitative type of research and it is characterised by the collection of data and analysing the same based on measurements and numbers. The research is equally a practical one, blending problem-based and theoretical research approaches. The theoretical approach is evident in the manner it focuses its ultimate aim on defining the ideal techniques for the creation of the materials for multimedia CBT, as well as attempting to impact improvements on the course in which students demonstrated low performances. The analysis of this study, in line with the guidelines provided by Smith (2014), demonstrates that this is a teacher-centered study, with the activities being researched intending to improve teacher performance in the respective courses in computer science. The research is apparently meant to be a traditional form of study that helps in improving the understanding and methods applied in creation and development of materials for multimedia CBT for use in higher education. Constructs Reale (2014) notes that in order to enhance the effectiveness of answering questions in an experiment as well as testing the research hypothesis, constructs should be adequately
|A2 Researcher’s conclusion |The researchers gave a strong conclusion outlining the main findings of the research |
· The results of the study, the interpretation of the data by the authors and any conclusions they include at the end of the article.
Therefore, validating the data as dependable, trustworthy, unfailing, sure, authentic, genuine and reputable as proven results in any research study (Smith 2003). In the event, credibility, the key feature is to establish the research results as true to being credible or believable to the research literature evaluations (Smith 2003). In addition to these ethics of evaluating research literature, here are five principles within the research study by Smith 2003; (1) be conscious of multiple roles; (2) avoiding roles which distort your judgment and harm to others (Smith 2003), (3) remember to adhere to the informed consent rules; avoiding risk adhered to respecting the confidentiality and privacy of all individuals involved (Smith
The section on different scientific approaches was useful in that it provided a framework for how the reader can apply research principles empirically. However, many of the components that are listed as being necessary for scientific research were redundant and cumbersome to process. For example, reliability and standardization appear to be very similar terms, and it would have been helpful for the authors to more thoroughly describe the distinction between the two components.
CRITERIA: The paper provides a clear and accurate summary of the most important aspects of the research: the research question(s), hypotheses, methods, results (tied back to hypotheses), and implications/
Furthermore, to add to the equipoise of a study, it is always better that preliminary studies are complete whose results do not lean completely negatively or positively (Fries & Krishnan, 2004, p. 250). In fact, in the debate about equipoise in research, it has been noted that,
Scientist should ensure that before a research is allowed to be published, it should be thoroughly analyzed and it satisfies all ethical policies and it complies with the “highest standards of research
The researcher has made the following conclusions according to the results of the current study:
What else could the authors have done? What should they do next? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this paper? Why does this research matter? (Synthesis)
According to Baridam (2001), it is not enough to review literature without presenting the studies by topic and determining how each of these topics relates to the researcher’s own study. A systematic presentation of the literature forms the foundation of the study.
It is important to mention at this stage that a research study presented by a researcher may not give complete information about the selected topic. There can be certain limitations of methodology and the new researchers may criticise it for being incomplete. As research is a circular process in which ideas can be added and extracted by researchers anytime, the application of the presented ideas by one researcher are tested and verified.
• Both research aims are well organized and progressive. Each aim contains multiple approaches that help to ensure the likelihood of success.
All in all, the results displayed by the analysis of each study correspond to the overall effort of the posed research. For example, supported results aligned with study hypotheses, but signified that certain mechanisms underlie the criterion for each of the tested variables on different levels according to Ashkanasy, Falkus, and Callan (2000). Whereas, Beeri et al., (2013)
Establishing a set of strategies to enhance the quality of research helps researchers to effectively manage bias and reactivity so legitimizing the findings of the research (Padget, 1998). One of the strategies adopted by the authors in
In the 20th century multimedia is introduced and became new tool of education for teachers and learners. Class became more adaptable to reach different kind of audience result of that even people of remote areas started to get grasp on the subject. But Multimedia still lack