The second paragraph of this chapter argues that a retail building that is damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure. Do you agree with this assessment? Defend your position.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 5, Problem 5.1QPP

The second paragraph of this chapter argues that a retail building that is damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure. Do you agree with this assessment? Defend your position.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Whether the given assessment is agreeable that a retail building that was damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure.

Explanation of Solution

An argument which is as follows:

A retail building and a hospital, both of which are constructed in a seismically active area and are designed considering the maximum likely earthquake for the area. Several years after the structures are built, the design earthquake occurs.The building did not collapse during the earthquake and no lives were lost. However, both buildings suffer some significant structural damage and must be demolished. Did both buildings fail during the earthquake?

The argumentthat the hospital building failed and the retail store didn’t is credible. The claim is valid as the design objectives built into the international building codes and modern building codes, that categorize structures based on their risk to human life and put these two structures in different categories with different performance requirements. The retail structure comes in the category II structure with substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure.

The design requirements for the retail structure are not to collapse during the design earthquake and allow occupants to safely exit the building, but it is not expected to survive the design earthquake.

Therefore, the retail structure is not a failure and is built according to the specifications.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

03:55

Students have asked these similar questions

What is the seismic coefficient? And how to determine it?

Q. As the Structural Engineer of ABC Engineering Consulting firm, you are required to design a residential building. The architectural drawing is a residential apartment with one (1) suspended floor and a roof slab. The elements of the building are casted monolithically. The design life of the building is 50 years and the fire resistant requirement is 1 hour. Use the given data below, design and provide sketches of all the structural elements of the building except the foundation. Given Data: Floor to floor height is 3300 mm. Nominal cover (Cm) = 30 mm f, = 500 N/mm. Fa = 25 N/mm? Concrete unit wt. = 25 kN/mm. Characteristic variable actions = 2 kN/m. Floor finishes, ceiling and services = 1.5 kN/m?. Assume all other parameters not given.

The numerous steps of the overall structural testing method in which you're participating are listed here.

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 5, Problem 5.1QPP

The second paragraph of this chapter argues that a retail building that is damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure. Do you agree with this assessment? Defend your position.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Whether the given assessment is agreeable that a retail building that was damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure.

Explanation of Solution

An argument which is as follows:

A retail building and a hospital, both of which are constructed in a seismically active area and are designed considering the maximum likely earthquake for the area. Several years after the structures are built, the design earthquake occurs.The building did not collapse during the earthquake and no lives were lost. However, both buildings suffer some significant structural damage and must be demolished. Did both buildings fail during the earthquake?

The argumentthat the hospital building failed and the retail store didn’t is credible. The claim is valid as the design objectives built into the international building codes and modern building codes, that categorize structures based on their risk to human life and put these two structures in different categories with different performance requirements. The retail structure comes in the category II structure with substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure.

The design requirements for the retail structure are not to collapse during the design earthquake and allow occupants to safely exit the building, but it is not expected to survive the design earthquake.

Therefore, the retail structure is not a failure and is built according to the specifications.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

03:55

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 5, Problem 5.1QPP

The second paragraph of this chapter argues that a retail building that is damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure. Do you agree with this assessment? Defend your position.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Whether the given assessment is agreeable that a retail building that was damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure.

Explanation of Solution

An argument which is as follows:

A retail building and a hospital, both of which are constructed in a seismically active area and are designed considering the maximum likely earthquake for the area. Several years after the structures are built, the design earthquake occurs.The building did not collapse during the earthquake and no lives were lost. However, both buildings suffer some significant structural damage and must be demolished. Did both buildings fail during the earthquake?

The argumentthat the hospital building failed and the retail store didn’t is credible. The claim is valid as the design objectives built into the international building codes and modern building codes, that categorize structures based on their risk to human life and put these two structures in different categories with different performance requirements. The retail structure comes in the category II structure with substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure.

The design requirements for the retail structure are not to collapse during the design earthquake and allow occupants to safely exit the building, but it is not expected to survive the design earthquake.

Therefore, the retail structure is not a failure and is built according to the specifications.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

03:55

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 5, Problem 5.1QPP

The second paragraph of this chapter argues that a retail building that is damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure. Do you agree with this assessment? Defend your position.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Whether the given assessment is agreeable that a retail building that was damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure.

Explanation of Solution

An argument which is as follows:

A retail building and a hospital, both of which are constructed in a seismically active area and are designed considering the maximum likely earthquake for the area. Several years after the structures are built, the design earthquake occurs.The building did not collapse during the earthquake and no lives were lost. However, both buildings suffer some significant structural damage and must be demolished. Did both buildings fail during the earthquake?

The argumentthat the hospital building failed and the retail store didn’t is credible. The claim is valid as the design objectives built into the international building codes and modern building codes, that categorize structures based on their risk to human life and put these two structures in different categories with different performance requirements. The retail structure comes in the category II structure with substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure.

The design requirements for the retail structure are not to collapse during the design earthquake and allow occupants to safely exit the building, but it is not expected to survive the design earthquake.

Therefore, the retail structure is not a failure and is built according to the specifications.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

03:55

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Whether the given assessment is agreeable that a retail building that was damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure.

Explanation of Solution

An argument which is as follows:

A retail building and a hospital, both of which are constructed in a seismically active area and are designed considering the maximum likely earthquake for the area. Several years after the structures are built, the design earthquake occurs.The building did not collapse during the earthquake and no lives were lost. However, both buildings suffer some significant structural damage and must be demolished. Did both buildings fail during the earthquake?

The argumentthat the hospital building failed and the retail store didn’t is credible. The claim is valid as the design objectives built into the international building codes and modern building codes, that categorize structures based on their risk to human life and put these two structures in different categories with different performance requirements. The retail structure comes in the category II structure with substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure.

The design requirements for the retail structure are not to collapse during the design earthquake and allow occupants to safely exit the building, but it is not expected to survive the design earthquake.

Therefore, the retail structure is not a failure and is built according to the specifications.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

Whether the given assessment is agreeable that a retail building that was damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure.

Explanation of Solution

An argument which is as follows:

A retail building and a hospital, both of which are constructed in a seismically active area and are designed considering the maximum likely earthquake for the area. Several years after the structures are built, the design earthquake occurs.The building did not collapse during the earthquake and no lives were lost. However, both buildings suffer some significant structural damage and must be demolished. Did both buildings fail during the earthquake?

The argumentthat the hospital building failed and the retail store didn’t is credible. The claim is valid as the design objectives built into the international building codes and modern building codes, that categorize structures based on their risk to human life and put these two structures in different categories with different performance requirements. The retail structure comes in the category II structure with substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure.

The design requirements for the retail structure are not to collapse during the design earthquake and allow occupants to safely exit the building, but it is not expected to survive the design earthquake.

Therefore, the retail structure is not a failure and is built according to the specifications.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

To determine

Whether the given assessment is agreeable that a retail building that was damaged during an earthquake and must be demolished may not constitute a failure.

Answer 12

Explanation of Solution

An argument which is as follows:

A retail building and a hospital, both of which are constructed in a seismically active area and are designed considering the maximum likely earthquake for the area. Several years after the structures are built, the design earthquake occurs.The building did not collapse during the earthquake and no lives were lost. However, both buildings suffer some significant structural damage and must be demolished. Did both buildings fail during the earthquake?

The argumentthat the hospital building failed and the retail store didn’t is credible. The claim is valid as the design objectives built into the international building codes and modern building codes, that categorize structures based on their risk to human life and put these two structures in different categories with different performance requirements. The retail structure comes in the category II structure with substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure.

The design requirements for the retail structure are not to collapse during the design earthquake and allow occupants to safely exit the building, but it is not expected to survive the design earthquake.

Therefore, the retail structure is not a failure and is built according to the specifications.